## Changelog since v1.5.3

### Other notable changes

* Fix AWS device allocator to only use valid device names ([#41455](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41455), [@gnufied](https://github.com/gnufied))

	if err != nil {
		return nil, toStorageErr(err)
	}
	return respBody, nil
}

// Stringer provides a canonicalized representation of network device.
func (client *storageRESTClient) String() string {
	return client.endpoint.String()
}

// IsOnline - returns whether client failed to connect or not.
func (client *storageRESTClient) IsOnline() bool {

      }
      drainQueue();
      return created;
    }

    // N.B. Draining the queue is only necessary to ensure that we don't accumulate empty references
    // in the array. We could skip this if we decide we don't care about holding on to Reference
    // objects indefinitely.
    private void drainQueue() {
      Reference<? extends L> ref;
      while ((ref = queue.poll()) != null) {

    }
    assertNull(map.get(unmappedKey));
  }

  public void testGetNull() {
    Map<K, V> map = makeEitherMap();
    if (allowsNullKeys) {
      if (allowsNullValues) {
        // TODO: decide what to test here.
      } else {
        assertEquals(map.containsKey(null), map.get(null) != null);
      }
    } else {
      try {
        V unused = map.get(null);

Então, quando é sua vez, você faz trabalho realmente "produtivo", você processa o menu, decide o que quer, pega a escolha de seu _crush_, paga, verifica se entregou o cartão ou a cédula correta, verifica se foi cobrado corretamente, verifica se seu pedido está correto etc.

* Fix issue where on re-registration of device plugin, `allocatable` was not getting updated. This issue makes devices invisible to the Kubelet if device plugin restarts. Only work-around, if this fix is not there, is to restart the kubelet and then start device plugin. ([#63118](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/63118), [@vikaschoudhary16](https://github.com/vikaschoudhary16))

I'll tell you a bit more about these **concepts** here, and that would hopefully give you the **intuition** you would need to decide how to deploy your API in very different environments, possibly even in **future** ones that don't exist yet.

By considering these concepts, you will be able to **evaluate and design** the best way to deploy **your own APIs**.

         *
         * @param step The build step to process
         */
        private void processStep(BuildStep step) {
            // 1. Apply reactor failure behavior to decide whether to schedule or skip
            ReactorBuildStatus status = reactorContext.getReactorBuildStatus();
            boolean isAfterStep = step.name.startsWith(AFTER);
            boolean shouldExecute;

* Backporting TPR fix to 1.4 ([#42380](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/42380), [@foxish](https://github.com/foxish))
* Fix AWS device allocator to only use valid device names ([#41455](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/41455), [@gnufied](https://github.com/gnufied))

   * set of the empty set is not the empty set, but a one-element set containing the empty set.
   *
   * <p>The returned set and its constituent sets use {@code equals} to decide whether two elements
   * are identical, even if the input set uses a different concept of equivalence.
   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the power set of a set with size {@code n} is of size {@code