assertThat(data.readByteString().hex(), "Data not empty")
        .isEqualTo("")
    }

  // Mutually exclusive. Use the one corresponding to the peer whose behavior you wish to test.
  private val serverWriter =
    WebSocketWriter(
      isClient = false,
      sink = data,
      random = random,
      perMessageDeflate = false,
      noContextTakeover = false,

    * Risk should be assessed in the PR.
        * Have installs and upgrades affected by this feature?
        * Is the feature still being worked on?
        * Is the default behavior altered?
        * Is this turned on by default?
        * How many users are affected by this change?

## Feature implementation

   * equivalent to that of calling {@code put(k, v)} on this map once for each mapping from key
   * {@code k} to value {@code v} in the specified map. The behavior of this operation is undefined
   * if the specified map is modified while the operation is in progress.
   *
   * @since 12.0
   */
  void putAll(Map<? extends K, ? extends V> m);

 * Table} interface.
 *
 * <p>Null keys and values are not supported.
 *
 * <p>See the {@link StandardTable} superclass for more information about the behavior of this
 * class.
 *
 * @author Jared Levy
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
class StandardRowSortedTable<R, C, V> extends StandardTable<R, C, V>
    implements RowSortedTable<R, C, V> {

   * It's unclear whether nulls were to be permitted or forbidden, but presumably the eventual fix
   * will be to permit them, as it seems more likely that code would depend on that behavior than on
   * the other. Thus, we say the bug is in set(), which fails to support null.
   */
  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  public static Method getSetNullSupportedMethod() {

        .start();

    Uninterruptibles.awaitUninterruptibly(latch);

    // See Dispatcher.LegacyAsyncDispatcher for an explanation of why there aren't really any
    // useful testable guarantees about the behavior of that dispatcher in a multithreaded
    // environment. Here we simply test that all the expected dispatches happened in some order.
    assertThat(dispatchedSubscribers).containsExactly(i1, i2, i3, s1, s1, s1, s1, s2, s2, s2, s2);

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *
 * @author James Sexton
 */
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
class MapIteratorCache<K, V> {
  private final Map<K, V> backingMap;

  /*
   * Per JDK: "the behavior of a map entry is undefined if the backing map has been modified after
   * the entry was returned by the iterator, except through the setValue operation on the map entry"

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

   * <p>Some algorithms that operate on a {@code PredecessorsFunction} may produce undesired results
   * if the returned {@link Iterable} contains duplicate elements. Implementations of such
   * algorithms should document their behavior in the presence of duplicates.
   *
   * <p>The elements of the returned {@code Iterable} must each be:
   *
   * <ul>
   *   <li>Non-null
   *   <li>Usable as {@code Map} keys (see the Guava User Guide's section on <a