pkg slices, func MinFunc[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 interface{}]($0, func($1, $1) int) $1 #60091
pkg slices, func Replace[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 interface{}]($0, int, int, ...$1) $0 #57433
pkg slices, func Reverse[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 interface{}]($0) #58565
pkg slices, func Sort[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 cmp.Ordered]($0) #60091
pkg slices, func SortFunc[$0 interface{ ~[]$1 }, $1 interface{}]($0, func($1, $1) int) #60091

El mismo ejemplo de arriba, devolviendo una `HTMLResponse`, podría verse así:

{* ../../docs_src/custom_response/tutorial003_py39.py hl[2,7,19] *}

/// warning | Advertencia

   *       contained by the latter range)
   * </ul>
   *
   * <p>Note that if {@code a.encloses(b)}, then {@code b.contains(v)} implies {@code
   * a.contains(v)}, but as the last two examples illustrate, the converse is not always true.
   *
   * <p>Being reflexive, antisymmetric and transitive, the {@code encloses} relation defines a
   * <i>partial order</i> over ranges. There exists a unique {@linkplain Range#all maximal} range

# Primeros Pasos { #first-steps }

El archivo FastAPI más simple podría verse así:

{* ../../docs_src/first_steps/tutorial001_py39.py *}

Copia eso en un archivo `main.py`.

Ejecuta el servidor en vivo:

<div class="termy">

```console
$ <font color="#4E9A06">fastapi</font> dev <u style="text-decoration-style:solid">main.py</u>

  private MinMaxPriorityQueue(Builder<? super E> builder, int queueSize) {
    Ordering<E> ordering = builder.ordering();
    this.minHeap = new Heap(ordering);
    this.maxHeap = new Heap(ordering.reverse());
    minHeap.otherHeap = maxHeap;
    maxHeap.otherHeap = minHeap;

    this.maximumSize = builder.maximumSize;
    // TODO(kevinb): pad?
    this.queue = new Object[queueSize];
  }

  @Override

      List<LockGraphNode> acquiredLockList = requireNonNull(acquiredLocks.get());
      LockGraphNode node = lock.getLockGraphNode();
      // Iterate in reverse because locks are usually locked/unlocked in a
      // LIFO order.
      for (int i = acquiredLockList.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        if (acquiredLockList.get(i) == node) {
          acquiredLockList.remove(i);

         * - Under Android, it does.
         *
         * We want users to see the same behavior when they compare a built-in TypeVariable against
         * ours as they do when they perform the same comparison in reverse. To provide that
         * behavior on all platforms, TypeResolver must return the appropriate TypeVariable
         * implementation in each of the three possible cases:
         *

          IllegalAccessException,
          InvocationTargetException,
          FactoryMethodReturnsNullException {
    if (cls.isEnum()) {
      return;
    }
    List<? extends Invokable<?, ?>> factories = Lists.reverse(getFactories(TypeToken.of(cls)));
    if (factories.isEmpty()) {
      return;
    }
    int numberOfParameters = factories.get(0).getParameters().size();

      List<LockGraphNode> acquiredLockList = requireNonNull(acquiredLocks.get());
      LockGraphNode node = lock.getLockGraphNode();
      // Iterate in reverse because locks are usually locked/unlocked in a
      // LIFO order.
      for (int i = acquiredLockList.size() - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
        if (acquiredLockList.get(i) == node) {
          acquiredLockList.remove(i);

    assertSame(valueThree, newFirst.getValue());
    assertEquals(hashThree, newFirst.getHash());
    assertSame(entryOne, newFirst.getNext());

    // tail (remaining entries are copied in reverse order)
    newFirst = segment.removeFromChainForTesting(entryThree, entryOne);
    assertSame(keyTwo, newFirst.getKey());
    assertSame(valueTwo, newFirst.getValue());
    assertEquals(hashTwo, newFirst.getHash());