if haveFastIndex {
			if j := bytealg.Index(s[i-last:], b[:n]); j >= 0 {
				return i + j - last
			}
		} else {
			// If bytealg.Index is not available a brute force search is
			// ~1.5-3x faster than Rabin-Karp since n is small.
			c0 := b[last]
			c1 := b[last-1] // There are at least 2 chars to match
		loop:
			for ; i < len(s); i++ {
				if s[i] == c0 && s[i-1] == c1 {
					for k := 2; k < n; k++ {

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import sun.misc.Unsafe;

/** Supertype of {@link AbstractFuture} that contains platform-specific functionality. */
// Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
@SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
@GwtCompatible
@ReflectionSupport(value = ReflectionSupport.Level.FULL)

     * @return the username
     */
    public String getUsername() {
        return this.username;
    }

    /**
     * Returns the password in plain text or <code>null</code> if the raw password
     * hashes were used to construct this <code>NtlmPasswordAuthentication</code>
     * object which will be the case when NTLM HTTP Authentication is
     * used. There is no way to retrieve a users password in plain text unless

Of course, there are some cases where there's no problem in running the previous steps multiple times, in that case, it's a lot easier to handle.

/// tip

Also, keep in mind that depending on your setup, in some cases you **might not even need any previous steps** before starting your application.

import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;
import sun.misc.Unsafe;

/** Supertype of {@link AbstractFuture} that contains platform-specific functionality. */
// Whenever both tests are cheap and functional, it's faster to use &, | instead of &&, ||
@SuppressWarnings("ShortCircuitBoolean")
@GwtCompatible
@ReflectionSupport(value = ReflectionSupport.Level.FULL)

		tc, ok := r.Context().Value(mcontext.ContextTraceKey).(*mcontext.TraceCtxt)
		if ok {
			tc.FuncName = funcName
			tc.ResponseRecorder.LogErrBody = true
		}

		mfs, err := gatherers.Gather()
		if err != nil && len(mfs) == 0 {
			writeErrorResponseJSON(r.Context(), w, toAdminAPIErr(r.Context(), err), r.URL)
			return
		}

		contentType := expfmt.Negotiate(r.Header)

    long singleChannelTime = measureReadTime(file, false);
    
    // Measure multi-channel throughput
    long multiChannelTime = measureReadTime(file, true);
    
    // Multi-channel should be faster
    assertTrue(multiChannelTime < singleChannelTime * 0.7);  // At least 30% improvement
}
```

## 8. Performance Metrics

### 8.1 Channel Statistics
```java

        }
      }
    }
    for (Invokable<?, ?> factory : factories) {
      factory.setAccessible(true);
    }
    // Sorts methods/constructors with the least number of parameters first since it's likely easier
    // to fill dummy parameter values for them. Ties are broken by name then by the string form of
    // the parameter list.
    return BY_NUMBER_OF_PARAMETERS
        .compound(BY_METHOD_NAME)

		return metaCacheEntriesSorted{o: m}
	}
	sort.Slice(m, m.less)
	return metaCacheEntriesSorted{o: m}
}

// isSorted returns whether the objects are sorted.
// This is usually orders of magnitude faster than actually sorting.
func (m metaCacheEntries) isSorted() bool {
	return sort.SliceIsSorted(m, m.less)
}

// shallowClone will create a shallow clone of the array objects,

   * equivalently, if this inverse view contains a key that is equal to {@code value}).
   *
   * <p>Due to the property that values in a BiMap are unique, this will tend to execute in
   * faster-than-linear time.
   *
   * @param value the object to search for in the values of this BiMap
   * @return true if a mapping exists from a key to the specified value
   */
  @Override