// name is the full name of the object including prefixes
	name string
	// Metadata. If none is present it is not an object but only a prefix.
	// Entries without metadata will only be present in non-recursive scans.
	metadata []byte

	// cached contains the metadata if decoded.
	cached *xlMetaV2

	// Indicates the entry can be reused and only one reference to metadata is expected.
	reusable bool
}

                                    message);
                        }
                    } else {
                        done = true;
                    }
                } else {
                    done = true;
                }
            }
        } while (!done);

        ProjectRelocation rel = new ProjectRelocation();
        rel.project = project;
        rel.pomArtifact = pomArtifact;

		wg.Add(1)
		go func(ctx context.Context, peerChannel <-chan MetricV2, wg *sync.WaitGroup) {
			defer wg.Done()
			for {
				select {
				case m, ok := <-peerChannel:
					if !ok {
						return
					}
					select {
					case ch <- m:
					case <-ctx.Done():
						return
					}
				case <-ctx.Done():
					return
				}
			}
		}(ctx, peerChannels[index], &wg)
	}

	timer := time.NewTimer(globalAPIConfig.getDeleteCleanupInterval())
	defer timer.Stop()

	for {
		select {
		case <-ctx.Done():
			return
		case <-timer.C:
			var wg sync.WaitGroup
			for _, set := range s.sets {
				wg.Add(1)
				go func(set *erasureObjects) {
					defer wg.Done()
					if set == nil {
						return
					}
					set.cleanupDeletedObjects(ctx)
				}(set)
			}
			wg.Wait()

   * Otherwise this returns an empty list of challenges.
   *
   * If a challenge uses the `token68` variant instead of auth params, there is exactly one
   * auth param in the challenge at key null. Invalid headers and challenges are ignored.
   * No semantic validation is done, for example that `Basic` auth must have a `realm`
   * auth param, this is up to the caller that interprets these challenges.
   */

  }

  public void testToArray() {
    // need explicit type parameter to avoid javac warning!?
    List<Byte> none = Arrays.<Byte>asList();
    assertThat(Bytes.toArray(none)).isEqualTo(EMPTY);

    List<Byte> one = Arrays.asList((byte) 1);
    assertThat(Bytes.toArray(one)).isEqualTo(ARRAY1);

    byte[] array = {(byte) 0, (byte) 1, (byte) 0x55};

# hash string like Java String::hashCode
hash_string() {
  str="${1:-}" h=0
  while [ -n "$str" ]; do
    char="${str%"${str#?}"}"
    h=$(((h * 31 + $(LC_CTYPE=C printf %d "'$char")) % 4294967296))
    str="${str#?}"
  done
  printf %x\\n $h
}

verbose() { :; }
[ "${MVNW_VERBOSE-}" != true ] || verbose() { printf %s\\n "${1-}"; }

die() {
  printf %s\\n "$1" >&2
  exit 1
}

trim() {
  # MWRAPPER-139:

For example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the...

change unified the key-management aspect within MinIO.

The unified KMS-based approach has several advantages:

- Key management is now centralized. There is one way to change or rotate encryption keys.
   There used to be two different mechanisms - one for regular S3 objects and one for IAM data.
- Reduced server startup time. For IAM encryption with the root credentials, MinIO had

     * contributed by {@link ModelBuilderRequest#getProfiles()}.
     *
     * @return The active external profiles or an empty list if none, never {@code null}.
     */
    @Nonnull
    List<Profile> getActiveExternalProfiles();

    /**
     * Gets the problem collector that collected problems encountered during the project building.
     *