///

## Reduzir duplicação

Reduzir a duplicação de código é uma das ideias principais no **FastAPI**.

A duplicação de código aumenta as chances de bugs, problemas de segurança, problemas de desincronização de código (quando você atualiza em um lugar, mas não em outros), etc.

E esses modelos estão compartilhando muitos dos dados e duplicando nomes e tipos de atributos.

To ensure that changes in the LDAP directory are reflected in object storage access changes, MinIO performs an **Automatic LDAP sync**. MinIO periodically queries the LDAP service to:

export MINIO_ROOT_PASSWORD=<SECRET_KEY>
minio server http://host{1...n}/export{1...m}
```

> **NOTE:** In above example `n` and `m` represent positive integers, _do not copy paste and expect it work make the changes according to local deployment and setup_.

For the things that need changes in your Pydantic models, the Pydantic team built [`bump-pydantic`](https://github.com/pydantic/bump-pydantic).

A command line tool that will **process your code** and update most of the things **automatically** for you. Make sure you have your code in git first, and review each of the changes to make sure everything is correct before committing the changes.

### Pydantic v1

 * are inherently approximate, routinely affected by periodic clock corrections. Because this class
 * (by default) uses {@link System#nanoTime}, it is unaffected by these changes.
 *
 * <p>Use this class instead of direct calls to {@link System#nanoTime} for two reasons:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>The raw {@code long} values returned by {@code nanoTime} are meaningless and unsafe to use

        if (getMojos() == null) {
            return null; // no mojo in this POM
        }

        // TODO could we use a map? Maybe if the parent did that for components too, as this is too vulnerable to
        // changes above not being propagated to the map
        for (MojoDescriptor desc : getMojos()) {
            if (goal.equals(desc.getGoal())) {
                return desc;
            }
        }
        return null;

     * duplication of properties (multiple name/value pairs with the same name can be added).
     */
    @Override
    public String toString() {
      // create a copy to keep it consistent in case value changes
      boolean omitNullValuesSnapshot = omitNullValues;
      boolean omitEmptyValuesSnapshot = omitEmptyValues;
      String nextSeparator = "";

#include "tensorflow/c/c_api_macros.h"
#include "tensorflow/c/eager/c_api.h"

// --------------------------------------------------------------------------
// Experimental C API for TensorFlow.
//
// The API here is subject to changes in the future.
// --------------------------------------------------------------------------

#ifdef __cplusplus
extern "C" {
#endif

// When `enable` is true, set

  private val writerQueue = taskRunner.newQueue()

  /** Ensures push promise callbacks events are sent in order per stream. */
  private val pushQueue = taskRunner.newQueue()

  /** Notifies the listener of settings changes. */
  private val settingsListenerQueue = taskRunner.newQueue()

  /** User code to run in response to push promise events. */
  private val pushObserver: PushObserver = builder.pushObserver

    }
    void tryClose() {
        synchronized( LOCK ) {

            /* Yes, there is the potential to drop packets
             * because we might close the socket during a
             * request. However the chances are slim and the
             * retry code should ensure the overall request
             * is serviced. The alternative complicates things
             * more than I think is worth it.
             */