* that pass this regex are valid -- only a performance hit is incurred, not a semantics bug.
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // regular expressions
  static final
  java.util.regex.Pattern
      FLOATING_POINT_PATTERN = fpPattern();

  @GwtIncompatible // regular expressions
  private static
  java.util.regex.Pattern
      fpPattern() {
    /*

ame</code></td><td><code>str</code></td><td><strong>REQUERIDO</strong> (si se establece un <code>license_info</code>). El nombre de la licencia utilizada para la API.</td></tr><tr><td><code>identifier</code></td><td><code>str</code></td><td>Una expresión de licencia <a href="https://spdx.org/licenses/" class="external-link" target="_blank">SPDX</a> para la API. El campo <code>identifier</code> es mutuamente excluyente del campo <code>url</code>. <small>Disponible desde OpenAPI 3.1.0, FastAPI 0.9...

        Object result = scriptEngine.evaluate(template, paramMap);
        assertEquals("Price: $100 (with 20% off)", result);
    }

    // Test evaluate method with nested expressions
    public void test_evaluate_withNestedExpressions() {
        String template = "${level1.level2.value}";
        Map<String, Object> paramMap = new HashMap<>();
        Map<String, Object> level2 = new HashMap<>();

labels.name=Nombre
labels.numOfThread=Número de hilos
labels.duplicateHostName=Nombre duplicado
labels.pageNumber=Número de página
labels.password=Contraseña
labels.paths=Rutas
labels.port=Puerto
labels.regex=Expresión regular
labels.regularName=Nombre regular
labels.replacement=Reemplazo
labels.sessionId=ID de sesión
labels.sortOrder=Orden de clasificación
labels.updatedBy=Actualizado por
labels.updatedTime=Fecha de actualización

 *       create a "fake" converter for a unit test. It is unnecessary (and confusing) to <i>mock</i>
 *       the {@code Converter} type using a mocking framework.
 *   <li>Pass two lambda expressions or method references to the {@link #from from} factory method.
 *   <li>Extend this class and implement its {@link #doForward} and {@link #doBackward} methods.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <p>Using a converter:
 *
 * <ul>

     / __/__  ___ _____/ /__
    _\ \/ _ \/ _ `/ __/  '_/
   /___/ .__/\_,_/_/ /_/\_\   version 2.1.0.2.6.0.0-598
      /_/

Using Scala version 2.11.8 (Java HotSpot(TM) 64-Bit Server VM, Java 1.8.0_112)
Type in expressions to have them evaluated.
Type :help for more information.

scala>
```

- At the _scala>_ prompt, submit the job by typing the following commands, Replace node names, file name, and file location with your values:

       * VarHandle in guava-android, even if they're unused under Android, we cause errors under
       * AGP: https://github.com/google/guava/issues/7769.
       *
       * My impression is that an AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater in a static field is similarly fast to
       * Unsafe on modern JVMs (if perhaps not quite as fast as VarHandle?). However, I'm not sure

   *     string} has a length of zero or cannot be parsed as a {@code float} value
   * @throws NullPointerException if {@code string} is {@code null}
   * @since 14.0
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // regular expressions
  public static @Nullable Float tryParse(String string) {
    if (Doubles.FLOATING_POINT_PATTERN.matcher(string).matches()) {
      // TODO(lowasser): could be potentially optimized, but only with
      // extensive testing

def get_sequential_burgers(number: int):
    # Do some sequential stuff to create the burgers
    return burgers
```

With `async def`, Python knows that, inside that function, it has to be aware of `await` expressions, and that it can "pause" ⏸ the execution of that function and go do something else 🔀 before coming back.

When you want to call an `async def` function, you have to "await" it. So, this won't work:

```Python

<h3 id="constants">Constants</h3>

<p>
Although the assembler takes its guidance from the Plan 9 assemblers,
it is a distinct program, so there are some differences.
One is in constant evaluation.
Constant expressions in the assembler are parsed using Go's operator
precedence, not the C-like precedence of the original.
Thus <code>3&amp;1&lt;&lt;2</code> is 4, not 0—it parses as <code>(3&amp;1)&lt;&lt;2</code>