transitionStates.add(state());
      return directExecutor();
    }
  }

  // Functional tests using real thread. We only verify publicly visible state.
  // Interaction assertions are done by the single-threaded unit tests.

  private static class DefaultService extends AbstractIdleService {
    @Override
    protected void startUp() throws Exception {}

    @Override

  }

  /**
   * Tests that all listeners complete, even if they were added before or after the future was
   * finishing. Also acts as a concurrency test to make sure the locking is done correctly when a
   * future is finishing so that no listeners can be lost.
   */
  public void testAllListenersCompleteSuccessfully()
      throws InterruptedException, ExecutionException {

					continue
				}

				cfgEntry.Data = string(data)
			}
			configHistory = append(configHistory, cfgEntry)
			count--
			if count == 0 {
				break
			}
		}
		if !res.IsTruncated {
			// We are done here
			break
		}
		marker = res.NextMarker
	}
	sort.Slice(configHistory, func(i, j int) bool {
		return configHistory[i].CreateTime.Before(configHistory[j].CreateTime)
	})
	return configHistory, nil
}

	listCtx, cancelList := context.WithCancel(ctx)
	filteredResults := o.gatherResults(listCtx, filterCh)
	var wg sync.WaitGroup
	wg.Add(1)
	var listErr error

	go func(o listPathOptions) {
		defer wg.Done()
		if o.Lifecycle == nil {
			// No filtering ahead, ask drives to stop
			// listing exactly at a specific limit.
			o.StopDiskAtLimit = true
		}
		listErr = z.listMerged(listCtx, o, filterCh)

There's no waiting 🕙 anywhere, just a lot of work to be done, on multiple places of the house.

You could have turns as in the burgers example, first the living room, then the kitchen, but as you are not waiting 🕙 for anything, just cleaning and cleaning, the turns wouldn't affect anything.

It would take the same amount of time to finish with or without turns (concurrency) and you would have done the same amount of work.

  If these mojos are to be first-class components, the configuration from these
  various sources must be consolidated and injected using the container.

  Currently, mojo configuration is done externally to the container, in the
  DefaultPluginManager in the maven-core API. In order to get from here to
  there, we need to do several things to add capability to the default

import java.nio.ByteBuffer;
import java.nio.ByteOrder;
import java.nio.charset.Charset;

/**
 * Skeleton implementation of {@link HashFunction}, appropriate for non-streaming algorithms. All
 * the hash computation done using {@linkplain #newHasher()} are delegated to the {@linkplain
 * #hashBytes(byte[], int, int)} method.
 *
 * @author Dimitris Andreou
 */
@Immutable

			// update the relevant metrics for them
			if bgSeq != nil {
				if err == nil {
					bgSeq.countHealed(res.Type)
				} else {
					bgSeq.countFailed(res.Type)
				}
			}
		case <-ctx.Done():
			return
		}
	}
}

func newHealRoutine() *healRoutine {
	workers := runtime.GOMAXPROCS(0) / 2

	if envHealWorkers := env.Get("_MINIO_HEAL_WORKERS", ""); envHealWorkers != "" {

		// continue to look for leaf errors underneath
		uerr = errors.Unwrap(leafErr)
		depth++
		if depth == unwrapErrsDepth {
			// If we have reached enough depth we
			// do not further recurse down, this
			// is done to avoid any unnecessary
			// latencies this might bring.
			break
		}
	}
	if uerr == nil {
		leafErr = err
	}
	return leafErr
}

// One log message per error.

 *     .addEquivalenceGroup("hello", "h" + "ello")
 *     .addEquivalenceGroup("world", "wor" + "ld")
 *     .test();
 * }
 *
 * <p>Note that testing {@link Object#equals(Object)} is more simply done using the {@link
 * EqualsTester}. It includes an extra test against an instance of an arbitrary class without having
 * to explicitly add another equivalence group.
 *
 * @author Gregory Kick
 * @since 10.0
 */