/** The key of the message: Past 24 Hours */
    public static final String LABELS_facet_timestamp_1day = "{labels.facet_timestamp_1day}";

    /** The key of the message: Past Week */
    public static final String LABELS_facet_timestamp_1week = "{labels.facet_timestamp_1week}";

    /** The key of the message: Past Month */

	for _, file := range w.current.Files {
		ast.Inspect(file, func(n ast.Node) bool {
			switch n := n.(type) {
			case *ast.File:
				if isDeprecated(n.Doc) {
					mark(n.Name)
				}
				return true
			case *ast.GenDecl:
				if isDeprecated(n.Doc) {
					for _, spec := range n.Specs {
						switch spec := spec.(type) {
						case *ast.ValueSpec:
							for _, id := range spec.Names {
								mark(id)

- github.com/spf13/afero: [b28a7ef → v1.2.2](https://github.com/spf13/afero/compare/b28a7ef...v1.2.2)
- github.com/spf13/cast: [e31f36f → v1.3.0](https://github.com/spf13/cast/compare/e31f36f...v1.3.0)
- github.com/spf13/cobra: [c439c4f → v0.0.5](https://github.com/spf13/cobra/compare/c439c4f...v0.0.5)

 * multiple routes to be attempted simultaneously.
 *
 * Events and sequences of events may be repeated for retries and follow-ups.
 *
 * All event methods must execute fast, without external locking, cannot throw exceptions, attempt
 * to mutate the event parameters, or be re-entrant back into the client. Any IO - writing to files
 * or network should be done asynchronously.
 */

eDay:"[Today at] LT",nextDay:"[Tomorrow at] LT",nextWeek:"dddd [at] LT",lastDay:"[Yesterday at] LT",lastWeek:"[Last] dddd [at] LT",sameElse:"L"},longDateFormat:{LTS:"h:mm:ss A",LT:"h:mm A",L:"MM/DD/YYYY",LL:"MMMM D, YYYY",LLL:"MMMM D, YYYY h:mm A",LLLL:"dddd, MMMM D, YYYY h:mm A"},invalidDate:"Invalid date",ordinal:"%d",dayOfMonthOrdinalParse:/\d{1,2}/,relativeTime:{future:"in %s",past:"%s ago",s:"a few seconds",ss:"%d seconds",m:"a minute",mm:"%d minutes",h:"an hour",hh:"%d hours",d:"a day",dd:"%d...

3389225,2,2014-03-31 09:42:15,2014-03-31 10:01:17,N,1,-73.950340270996094,40.792228698730469,-73.941970825195313,40.842235565185547,1,4.47,17.5,0,0.5,0,0,,,18,2,1,75,244,green,0.16,0.0,0.0,56,36,8.28,1267,168,1,Manhattan,016800,1016800,E,MN33,East Harlem South,3804,911,251,1,Manhattan,025100,1025100,E,MN36,Washington Heights South,3801...

configuration using e.g. the `mc admin config` commands you will need to adjust
your deployment.

Even though this change is backward compatible we do not expect that it affects
the vast majority of deployments in any negative way.

> Will an upgrade of an existing MinIO cluster impact the SLA of the cluster or will it even cause downtime?

				Service:      "iam",
				Region:       "us-east-1",
				ResourceType: "role",
				ResourceID:   "my-role",
			},
			want: "arn:minio:iam:us-east-1::role/my-role",
		},
		{
			arn: ARN{
				Partition:    "minio",
				Service:      "",
				Region:       "us-east-1",
				ResourceType: "role",
				ResourceID:   "my-role",
			},
			want: "arn:minio::us-east-1::role/my-role",
		},
	}
	for _, tt := range tests {

  /** The HTTP {@code If-Unmodified-Since} header field name. */
  public static final String IF_UNMODIFIED_SINCE = "If-Unmodified-Since";
  /** The HTTP {@code Last-Event-ID} header field name. */
  public static final String LAST_EVENT_ID = "Last-Event-ID";
  /** The HTTP {@code Max-Forwards} header field name. */
  public static final String MAX_FORWARDS = "Max-Forwards";
  /** The HTTP {@code Origin} header field name. */

 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *
 * <p>The multimap does not store duplicate key-value pairs. Adding a new key-value pair equal to an
 * existing key-value pair has no effect.
 *