<exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

        }

        if (!jobManager.findJobByUniqueOf(LaJobUnique.of(id)).isPresent()) {
            if (logger.isDebugEnabled()) {
                logger.debug("Job {} is running.", id);
            }
            return;
        }

        TimeoutTask task = null;
        try {
            if (scheduledJob.isLoggingEnabled()) {
                jobHelper.store(jobLog);

      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Used to delay string formatting until actually required, as it otherwise shows up in the test
   * execution profile when running an extremely large numbers of tests.
   */
  private String reportContext(List<E> expected) {
    return Platform.format(
        "expected collection %s; actual collection %s", expected, this.collection);
  }

<div class="termy">

```console
$ OPENAPI_URL= uvicorn main:app

<span style="color: green;">INFO</span>:     Uvicorn running on http://127.0.0.1:8000 (Press CTRL+C to quit)
```

</div>

Então, se você acessar as URLs em `/openapi.json`, `/docs` ou `/redoc`, você receberá apenas um erro `404 Não Encontrado` como:

```JSON
{

          }
          // Log it and keep going.
          logger
              .get()
              .log(
                  Level.SEVERE,
                  "Exception while running callbacks for " + listener + " on " + executor,
                  e);
          throw e;
        }
      }
    }

    @Override
    @SuppressWarnings("CatchingUnchecked") // sneaky checked exception

   * com.google.common.testing.junit4.TearDownTestCase} for example.
   *
   * <p>A failing {@link TearDown} may or may not fail a tl4j test, depending on the version of
   * JUnit test case you are running under. To avoid failing in the face of an exception regardless
   * of JUnit version, implement a {@link SloppyTearDown} instead.
   *
   * <p>tl4j details: For backwards compatibility, {@code junit3.TearDownTestCase} currently does