@Nullable Object get() throws Throwable;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingSupplier supplier) {
    return doAssertThrows(expectedThrowable, supplier, /* userPassedSupplier= */ true);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingRunnable runnable) {

    }
  }

  private enum LinkedListSupplier implements Supplier<List<?>> {
    INSTANCE;

    public static <V extends @Nullable Object> Supplier<List<V>> instance() {
      // Each call generates a fresh LinkedList, which can serve as a List<V> for any V.
      @SuppressWarnings({"rawtypes", "unchecked"})
      Supplier<List<V>> result = (Supplier) INSTANCE;
      return result;
    }

    @Override

    @Nullable Object get() throws Throwable;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingSupplier supplier) {
    return doAssertThrows(expectedThrowable, supplier, /* userPassedSupplier= */ true);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingRunnable runnable) {

import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Explicitly named subinterface of {@link Supplier} that can be marked {@literal @}{@link
 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

          A result(Collector<T, A, R> collector, Iterable<T> inputs) {
        A accum = collector.supplier().get();
        for (T input : inputs) {
          A newAccum = collector.supplier().get();
          collector.accumulator().accept(newAccum, input);
          accum = collector.combiner().apply(accum, newAccum);
        }
        return accum;
      }

    @Nullable Object get() throws Throwable;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingSupplier supplier) {
    return doAssertThrows(expectedThrowable, supplier, /* userPassedSupplier= */ true);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingRunnable runnable) {

    @Nullable Object get() throws Throwable;
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingSupplier supplier) {
    return doAssertThrows(expectedThrowable, supplier, /* userPassedSupplier= */ true);
  }

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  static <T extends Throwable> T assertThrows(
      Class<T> expectedThrowable, ThrowingRunnable runnable) {

  @Override
  public Optional<T> or(Optional<? extends T> secondChoice) {
    return (Optional<T>) checkNotNull(secondChoice);
  }

  @Override
  public T or(Supplier<? extends T> supplier) {
    return checkNotNull(
        supplier.get(), "use Optional.orNull() instead of a Supplier that returns null");
  }

  @Override
  @CheckForNull
  public T orNull() {
    return null;
  }

  @Override
  public Set<T> asSet() {

import com.google.common.base.Supplier;
import com.google.errorprone.annotations.Immutable;

/**
 * Explicitly named subinterface of {@link Supplier} that can be marked {@literal @}{@link
 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
public class NewCustomTableTest extends AbstractTableTest<Character> {

  @Override
  protected Table<String, Integer, Character> create(@Nullable Object... data) {
    Supplier<TreeMap<Integer, Character>> factory =
        new Supplier<TreeMap<Integer, Character>>() {
          @Override
          public TreeMap<Integer, Character> get() {
            return Maps.newTreeMap();
          }
        };