* input byte array {@code {0x54, 0x32}} would yield the {@code char} value {@code '\\u5432'}.
   *
   * <p>Arguably, it's preferable to use {@link java.nio.ByteBuffer}; that library exposes much more
   * flexibility at little cost in readability.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code bytes} has fewer than 2 elements
   */
  @GwtIncompatible // doesn't work

    assertThat((long) arraysDim1 * arraysDim2).isNotEqualTo((long) (arraysDim1 * arraysDim2));

    boolean[][] arrays = new boolean[arraysDim1][];
    // it's shared to avoid using too much memory in tests
    boolean[] sharedArray = new boolean[arraysDim2];
    Arrays.fill(arrays, sharedArray);

    try {
      Booleans.concat(arrays);
      fail();

   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the cartesian product of sets of size {@code m, n, p} is a
   * set of size {@code m x n x p}, its actual memory consumption is much smaller. When the
   * cartesian set is constructed, the input sets are merely copied. Only as the resulting set is
   * iterated are the individual lists created, and these are not retained after iteration.
   *

      expectedInsertions = 1;
    }
    /*
     * TODO(user): Put a warning in the javadoc about tiny fpp values, since the resulting size
     * is proportional to -log(p), but there is not much of a point after all, e.g.
     * optimalM(1000, 0.0000000000000001) = 76680 which is less than 10kb. Who cares!
     */
    long numBits = optimalNumOfBits(expectedInsertions, fpp);

And it generates OpenAPI schemas.

That's how it works in Flask, Starlette, Responder, etc.

But then, we have again the problem of having a micro-syntax, inside of a Python string (a big YAML).

The editor can't help much with that. And if we modify parameters or Marshmallow schemas and forget to also modify that YAML docstring, the generated schema would be obsolete.

/// info

APISpec was created by the same Marshmallow developers.

   * invokeAny} which are pending serial execution, even the subset of the tasks that have not yet
   * started execution. It is unclear from the {@code ExecutorService} specification if these should
   * be included, and it's much easier to implement the interpretation that they not be. Finally, a
   * call to {@code shutdown} or {@code shutdownNow} may result in concurrent calls to {@code

	if x == o {
		return false
	}
	// Prefer newest modtime.
	if x.ModTime != o.ModTime {
		return x.ModTime > o.ModTime
	}

	// The following doesn't make too much sense, but we want sort to be consistent nonetheless.
	// Prefer lower types
	if x.Type != o.Type {
		return x.Type < o.Type
	}
	// Consistent sort on signature

<p>
The assembler is based on the input style of the Plan 9 assemblers, which is documented in detail
<a href="https://9p.io/sys/doc/asm.html">elsewhere</a>.
If you plan to write assembly language, you should read that document although much of it is Plan 9-specific.
The current document provides a summary of the syntax and the differences with
what is explained in that document, and
describes the peculiarities that apply when writing assembly code to interact with Go.

   * higher value than you need can waste space and time, and a significantly lower value can lead
   * to thread contention. But overestimates and underestimates within an order of magnitude do not
   * usually have much noticeable impact. A value of one permits only one thread to modify the cache
   * at a time, but since read operations and cache loading computations can proceed concurrently,

   * resizing.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code size} is negative
   */
  public static ByteArrayDataOutput newDataOutput(int size) {
    // When called at high frequency, boxing size generates too much garbage,
    // so avoid doing that if we can.
    if (size < 0) {
      throw new IllegalArgumentException(String.format("Invalid size: %s", size));
    }
    return newDataOutput(new ByteArrayOutputStream(size));