new ArbitraryOrdering() {
          @Override
          int identityHashCode(Object object) {
            return ((Integer) object) % 5; // fake tons of collisions!
          }
        };

    // Don't let the elements be in such a predictable order
    list = shuffledCopy(list, new Random(1));

    sort(list, arbitrary);

    // Now we don't care what order it's put the list in, only that

        new ArbitraryOrdering() {
          @Override
          int identityHashCode(Object object) {
            return ((Integer) object) % 5; // fake tons of collisions!
          }
        };

    // Don't let the elements be in such a predictable order
    list = shuffledCopy(list, new Random(1));

    sort(list, arbitrary);

    // Now we don't care what order it's put the list in, only that

    # https://github.com/tensorflow/tensorflow/issues/10521
    # Overriding eigen strong inline speeds up the compiling of
    # conv_grad_ops_3d.cc and conv_ops_3d.cc by 20 minutes,
    # but this also hurts the performance. Let users decide what they want.
    write_to_bazelrc('build --define=override_eigen_strong_inline=true')


def config_info_line(name, help_text):

"így", "illetve", "ill.", "ill", "ilyen", "ilyenkor", "ison", "ismét", "itt", "jó", "jól", "jobban", "kell", "kellett", "keresztül", "keressünk", "ki", "kívül", "között", "közül", "legalább", "lehet", "lehetett", "legyen", "lenne", "lenni", "lesz", "lett", "maga", "magát", "majd", "majd", "már", "más", "másik", "meg", "még", "mellett", "mert", "mely", "melyek", "mi", "mit", "míg", "miért", "milyen", "mikor", "minden", "mindent", "mindenki", "mindig", "mint", "mintha", "mivel", "most", "nagy", "nagyobb",...

"így", "illetve", "ill.", "ill", "ilyen", "ilyenkor", "ison", "ismét", "itt", "jó", "jól", "jobban", "kell", "kellett", "keresztül", "keressünk", "ki", "kívül", "között", "közül", "legalább", "lehet", "lehetett", "legyen", "lenne", "lenni", "lesz", "lett", "maga", "magát", "majd", "majd", "már", "más", "másik", "meg", "még", "mellett", "mert", "mely", "melyek", "mi", "mit", "míg", "miért", "milyen", "mikor", "minden", "mindent", "mindenki", "mindig", "mint", "mintha", "mivel", "most", "nagy", "nagyobb",...

			enabled = true
		}
		v, _ := currKVS.Lookup(hkv.Key)
		if v == "" && !hkv.Optional && enabled {
			// Return error only if the
			// key is enabled, for state=off
			// let it be empty.
			return false, Errorf(
				"'%s' is not optional for '%s' sub-system, please check '%s' documentation",
				hkv.Key, subSys, subSys)
		}
	}
	c[subSys][tgt] = currKVS
	return dynamic, nil

				p.errorf("misplaced //go:build comment")
			}
			continue
		}
		if tok != '\n' {
			p.sawCode = true
		}
		if tok == '#' {
			// A leftover wisp of a #include/#define/etc,
			// to let us know that p.sawCode should be true now.
			// Otherwise ignored.
			continue
		}
		return tok
	}
}

// line consumes a single assembly line from p.lex of the form
//

	// accounts), STS accounts, internal IDP accounts, etc) with the
	// policy.UpdateServiceAccountAdminAction permission can update any service
	// account.
	//
	// 2. We would like to let a user update their own access keys, however it
	// is currently blocked pending a re-design. Users are still able to delete
	// and re-create them.
	if !globalIAMSys.IsAllowed(policy.Args{
		AccountName:     cred.AccessKey,

   * the computation -- makes sense, and if we don't convert it, the user still has to write a
   * try-catch block.
   *
   * If you think you would use this method, let us know. You might also look into the
   * Fork-Join framework: http://docs.oracle.com/javase/tutorial/essential/concurrency/forkjoin.html
   */

* Adds a new `kubeadm config` command that lets users tell `kubeadm upgrade` what kubeadm configuration to use and lets users view the current state. ([#50980](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/50980), [@luxas](https://github.com/luxas))