import java.util.Map;
import junit.framework.Test;

/**
 * Tests the {@link Map} implementations of {@link java.util}, suppressing tests that trip known
 * bugs in OpenJDK 6 or higher.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): consider renaming this class in light of our now running it under newer JDKs.
public class OpenJdk6MapTests extends TestsForMapsInJavaUtil {
  public static Test suite() {

        return 0;
      }
      if (lhs == null) {
        // lhs (null) comes just before justAfterNull.
        // If rhs is b, lhs comes first.
        if (rhs.equals(justAfterNull)) {
          return -1;
        }
        return justAfterNull.compareTo(rhs);
      }
      if (rhs == null) {
        // rhs (null) comes just before justAfterNull.
        // If lhs is b, rhs comes first.

  fi
fi
# VERY basic check to ensure the [and-cuda] package variant is installable.
# Checks TFCI_BAZEL_COMMON_ARGS for "gpu" or "cuda", implying that the test is
# relevant. All of the GPU test machines have CUDA installed via other means,
# so I am not sure how to verify that the dependencies themselves are valid for
# the moment.
if [[ "$TFCI_BAZEL_COMMON_ARGS" =~ gpu|cuda ]]; then

  // If this test fails, all bets are off
  public void testReallySimpleFingerprints() {
    assertEquals(8473225671271759044L, fingerprint("test".getBytes(UTF_8)));
    // 32 characters long
    assertEquals(7345148637025587076L, fingerprint(Strings.repeat("test", 8).getBytes(UTF_8)));
    // 256 characters long
    assertEquals(4904844928629814570L, fingerprint(Strings.repeat("test", 64).getBytes(UTF_8)));
  }

       for the change (usually before you start working on it).  Trivial changes like typos do not
       require a JIRA issue. Your pull request should address just this issue, without
       pulling in other changes.
 - [ ] Each commit in the pull request should have a meaningful subject line and body.
 - [ ] Format the pull request title like `[MNG-XXX] SUMMARY`,

        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the
        community can discuss and debate whether this feature is actually the *best* way to address

import java.util.logging.Logger;

/**
 * Simple utility for when you want to create a {@link TearDown} that may throw an exception but
 * should not fail a test when it does. (The behavior of a {@code TearDown} that throws an exception
 * varies; see its documentation for details.) Use it just like a {@code TearDown}, except override
 * {@link #sloppyTearDown()} instead.
 *
 * @author Luiz-Otavio Zorzella
 * @since 10.0
 */
@GwtCompatible

</blockquote>

## Investigation

By using all the previous alternatives I had the chance to learn from all of them, take ideas, and combine them in the best way I could find for myself and the teams of developers I have worked with.

    // 32 characters long
    assertEquals(-4196240717365766262L, fingerprint(Strings.repeat("test", 8).getBytes(UTF_8)));
    // 256 characters long
    assertEquals(3500507768004279527L, fingerprint(Strings.repeat("test", 64).getBytes(UTF_8)));
  }

  public void testStringsConsistency() {
    for (String s : Arrays.asList("", "some", "test", "strings", "to", "try")) {

	//
	// NOTE that we are requeueing namespaces here explicitly to work around
	// test flakes with the fake kube client in `pkg/kube/client.go` -
	// because we are using `List()` in the handler, without this requeue,
	// the fake client will sometimes drop pod events leading to test flakes.
	//
	// WaitForCacheSync *helps*, but does not entirely fix this problem