}
    return array[min];
  }

  static double select(int k, double[] array) {
    // This is basically a copy of com.google.math.Rank#select, with a small change in the method
    // signature: we make k 0-based rather than 1-based; and we drop from and to, and always work on
    // the whole array.
    int from = 0;
    int to = array.length - 1;

    while (true) {
      if (to <= from + 1) {

import org.apache.maven.api.model.Model;
import org.apache.maven.api.services.Interpolator;
import org.apache.maven.project.MavenProject;
import org.eclipse.aether.RepositorySystemSession;
import org.eclipse.aether.artifact.Artifact;
import org.eclipse.aether.deployment.DeployRequest;
import org.eclipse.aether.installation.InstallRequest;

import static java.util.Objects.requireNonNull;

/**

 *       }
 *     };
 * iteratorTester.test();
 * iteratorTester.testForEachRemaining();
 * }
 *
 * <p><b>Note</b>: It is necessary to use {@code IteratorTester.KnownOrder} as shown above, rather
 * than {@code KnownOrder} directly, because otherwise the code cannot be compiled.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked

   *
   * <p>This method is useful primarily when we make a reflective call to a method with no {@code
   * throws} clause: Java forces us to handle an arbitrary {@link Throwable} from that method,
   * rather than just the {@link RuntimeException} or {@link Error} that should be possible. (And in
   * fact the static type of {@link Throwable} is occasionally justified even for a method with no

   *
   * <p>This method is useful primarily when we make a reflective call to a method with no {@code
   * throws} clause: Java forces us to handle an arbitrary {@link Throwable} from that method,
   * rather than just the {@link RuntimeException} or {@link Error} that should be possible. (And in
   * fact the static type of {@link Throwable} is occasionally justified even for a method with no

 *
 * Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing,
 * software distributed under the License is distributed on an
 * "AS IS" BASIS, WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY
 * KIND, either express or implied.  See the License for the
 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.internal.impl;

import javax.inject.Inject;

import org.apache.maven.api.model.Plugin;
import org.eclipse.aether.AbstractRepositoryListener;
import org.eclipse.aether.RepositoryEvent;
import org.eclipse.aether.RepositorySystemSession;
import org.eclipse.aether.RequestTrace;
import org.eclipse.aether.artifact.Artifact;
import org.eclipse.aether.collection.CollectStepData;
import org.eclipse.aether.graph.Dependency;
import org.eclipse.aether.graph.DependencyNode;

        }
        sb.append(comp);
      }
      dummy ^= sb.toString().length();
    }
    return dummy;
  }

  /**
   * Similar to the above, but keeps a boolean flag rather than checking for the string accumulated
   * so far being empty. As a result, it does not have the above-mentioned bug.
   */
  @Benchmark
  int booleanIfFirst(int reps) {
    int dummy = 0;

 *       }
 *     };
 * iteratorTester.test();
 * iteratorTester.testForEachRemaining();
 * }
 *
 * <p><b>Note</b>: It is necessary to use {@code IteratorTester.KnownOrder} as shown above, rather
 * than {@code KnownOrder} directly, because otherwise the code cannot be compiled.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Chris Povirk
 */
@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?