We have a lifecycle mapping for the packaging of *jar* below. You see that for this packaging we have a *default* lifecycle and a list of phases where each phase is a comma separated list of goals to run and they are in the form groupId:artifactId:version.

<configuration>
  <lifecycles>
    <lifecycle>
      <id>default</id>
      <phases>
        <process-resources>org.apache.maven.plugins:maven-resources-plugin:resources</process-resources>

/// note

When defining a <a href="https://docs.pydantic.dev/latest/concepts/types/#unions" class="external-link" target="_blank">`Union`</a>, include the most specific type first, followed by the less specific type. In the example below, the more specific `PlaneItem` comes before `CarItem` in `Union[PlaneItem, CarItem]`.

///

{* ../../docs_src/extra_models/tutorial003_py310.py hl[1,14:15,18:20,33] *}

			wantOk:       true,
		},
		{
			name:         "one zero, below quorum",
			m:            metaCacheEntries{inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[0], inputSerialized[0], metaCacheEntry{}},
			r:            metadataResolutionParams{dirQuorum: 4, objQuorum: 4, strict: false},
			wantSelected: nil,
			wantOk:       false,
		},
		{
			name:         "one zero, below quorum, strict",

        fireEvent(ResolutionListener.TEST_ARTIFACT, listeners, node);

        Object key = node.getKey();

        // TODO Does this check need to happen here? Had to add the same call
        // below when we iterate on child nodes -- will that suffice?
        if (managedVersions.containsKey(key)) {
            manageArtifact(node, managedVersions, listeners);
        }

 *      <td>Specifications for the parameters which this Mojo uses will be provided in <b>parameter</b> sub-elements
 *          in this section.
 *          <br>
 *          <i>NOTE: Parameters are discussed in more detail below.</i>
 *      </td>
 *   </tr>
 * </table>
 * <p>This is only a small set of all the options. A complete list can be found at

	locked := testDualWriteLock(t, time.Second)

	expected := false
	if locked != expected {
		t.Errorf("TestDualWriteLockTimedOut(): \nexpected %#v\ngot      %#v", expected, locked)
	}
}

// Test cases below are copied 1 to 1 from sync/rwmutex_test.go (adapted to use LRWMutex)

// Borrowed from rwmutex_test.go
func parallelReader(ctx context.Context, m *LRWMutex, clocked, cunlock, cdone chan bool) {

      Object form, made available under the License, as indicated by a
      copyright notice that is included in or attached to the work
      (an example is provided in the Appendix below).

      "Derivative Works" shall mean any work, whether in Source or Object
      form, that is based on (or derived from) the Work and for which the
      editorial revisions, annotations, elaborations, or other modifications

// RELEASE.2018-03-16T22-52-12Z after migrating v1 to v2 to v3. This
// migration failed to capture '.This' field properly which indicates
// the disk UUID association. Below error message is returned when
// we see this situation in format.json, for more info refer
// https://github.com/minio/minio/issues/5667
var errErasureV3ThisEmpty = fmt.Errorf("Erasure format version 3 has This field empty")

        dstIndex++;
        dst[dstIndex++] = (byte) (byteCount >> 8 & 0xFF);
        dstIndex += byteCount;

        /* Normally, without intervention everything would batch
         * with everything else. If the below clause evaluates true
         * the andx command will not be written and therefore the
         * response will not read a batched command and therefore
         * the 'received' member of the response object will not

 * ListenableFuture} directly.
 *
 * @author Sven Mawson
 * @author Nishant Thakkar
 * @since 1.0
 */
/*
 * Some of the annotations below were added after we released our separate
 * com.google.guava:listenablefuture:1.0 artifact. (For more on that artifact, see
 * https://github.com/google/guava/releases/tag/v27.0) This means that the copy of ListenableFuture