domains.domains[0].name = new UnicodeString("TESTDOM", false);
            domains.domains[0].sid = new jcifs.dcerpc.rpc.sid_t();
            rpc.domains = domains;

            // Names: provide account names and types for each SID
            lsarpc.LsarTransNameArray names = new lsarpc.LsarTransNameArray();
            names.count = in.length;
            names.names = new lsarpc.LsarTranslatedName[in.length];

And then, you could give that JWT token to a user (or bot), and they could use it to perform those actions (drive the car, or edit the blog post) without even needing to have an account, just with the JWT token your API generated for that.

Using these ideas, JWT can be used for way more sophisticated scenarios.

    /** LDAP initial context factory configuration key. */
    public static final String LDAP_INITIAL_CONTEXT_FACTORY = "ldap.initial.context.factory";

    /** LDAP account filter configuration key. */
    public static final String LDAP_ACCOUNT_FILTER = "ldap.account.filter";

    /** LDAP group filter configuration key. */
    public static final String LDAP_GROUP_FILTER = "ldap.group.filter";

	_, err = deleteUserRPC.Call(ctx, client.gridConn(), grid.NewMSSWith(map[string]string{
		peerRESTUser: accessKey,
	}))
	return err
}

// DeleteServiceAccount - delete a specific service account.
func (client *peerRESTClient) DeleteServiceAccount(ctx context.Context, accessKey string) (err error) {
	_, err = deleteSvcActRPC.Call(ctx, client.gridConn(), grid.NewMSSWith(map[string]string{
		peerRESTUser: accessKey,

labels.ldap_admin_security_principal=DN bind
labels.ldap_admin_security_credentials=Password
labels.ldap_base_dn=DN base
labels.ldapAccountFilter=Filtro account
labels.ldapGroupFilter=Filtro gruppo
labels.ldapMemberofAttribute=Attributo memberOf
labels.ldap_account_filter=Filtro account
labels.ldap_group_filter=Filtro gruppo
labels.ldap_memberof_attribute=Attributo memberOf
labels.notification_login=Pagina di login

   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> This method simply returns everything after the last '{@code .}' in the file's
   * name as determined by {@link File#getName}. It does not account for any filesystem-specific
   * behavior that the {@link File} API does not already account for. For example, on NTFS it will
   * report {@code "txt"} as the extension for the filename {@code "foo.exe:.txt"} even though NTFS

        raf.writeShort(1);
        raf.writeChar('A');
        raf.writeInt(1);
        raf.writeLong(1L);
        raf.writeFloat(1.0f);
        raf.writeDouble(1.0);

        // Verify length counts - using times() to check exact counts
        verify(raf, times(2)).write(any(byte[].class), anyInt(), eq(2)); // short and char
        verify(raf, times(2)).write(any(byte[].class), anyInt(), eq(4)); // int and float

    int size = 0;
    for (Multiset.Entry<E> entry : getMultiset().entrySet()) {
      size += entry.getCount();
    }
    assertEquals(
        "multiset.size() should be the sum of the counts of all entries",
        size,
        getMultiset().size());
  }

  /** Call the {@code setCount()} method under test, and check its return value. */
  abstract void setCountCheckReturnValue(E element, int count);

            return baos.toByteArray();
        } catch (IOException e) {
            throw new CIFSException("LZ77+Huffman decompression failed", e);
        }
    }

    /**
     * Counts the number of unique bytes in the data (for entropy estimation).
     */
    private int countUniqueBytes(byte[] data) {
        boolean[] seen = new boolean[256];
        int count = 0;

add` does not apply to `DELETE` operations. The version being deleted on the source cluster needs to maintain state and ensure that the operation is mirrored to the target cluster prior to completing on the source object version. Since this needs to account for the target cluster availability and the need to serialize concurrent DELETE operations on different versions of the same object during multi DELETE operations, the current implementation queues the `DELETE` operations in both sync and async modes....