* @param request The model building request that holds further settings, must not be {@code null}.
     * @param problems The container used to collect problems that were encountered, must not be {@code null}.
     */
    void mergeDuplicates(Model model, ModelBuildingRequest request, ModelProblemCollector problems);

    /**
     * Sets default values in the specified model that for technical reasons cannot be set directly in the Modello

        Did you *actually* encounter the need for this feature in a real-world scenario, or is it
        just a feature that seems like a sensible addition to Guava?


        Before new features get added to Guava, we really want to be sure that it's for a use case
        that actually comes up in the real world. We want to hear the real-world use case so the

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

     * #queue}, the Executor will complete its tasks, and then restore the interruption. This means
     * that once the Thread returns to the Executor that this Executor composes, the interruption
     * will still be present. If the composed Executor is an ExecutorService, it can respond to
     * shutdown() by returning tasks queued on that Thread after {@link #worker} drains the queue.
     */

     * #queue}, the Executor will complete its tasks, and then restore the interruption. This means
     * that once the Thread returns to the Executor that this Executor composes, the interruption
     * will still be present. If the composed Executor is an ExecutorService, it can respond to
     * shutdown() by returning tasks queued on that Thread after {@link #worker} drains the queue.
     */

 * take advantage of the {@linkplain Futures utilities built atop the class}. The way that you will
 * create {@code ListenableFuture} instances depends on how you currently create {@code Future}
 * instances:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>If you receive them from an {@code java.util.concurrent.ExecutorService}, convert that

   * has not added {@link AnnotatedType}. That means that we cannot implement that interface in
   * source code in a way that will compile on both Java and Android. If we include the {@code
   * getAnnotatedBounds()} method, then its return type means it won't compile on Android, while if
   * we don't include the method, then the compiler will complain that an abstract method is

   * for {@code asMapOfRanges().iterator().remove()}.
   *
   * <p>The returned range map will throw an {@link IllegalArgumentException} on an attempt to
   * insert a range not {@linkplain Range#encloses(Range) enclosed} by {@code range}.
   */
  // TODO(cpovirk): Consider documenting that IAE on the various methods that can throw it.

  public static int hashCode(int value) {
    return value;
  }

  /**
   * Returns the {@code int} value that is equal to {@code value}, if possible.
   *
   * <p><b>Note:</b> this method is now unnecessary and should be treated as deprecated. Use {@link
   * Math#toIntExact(long)} instead, but be aware that that method throws {@link

  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see