Luckily for Alice, the little magic bottle had now had its full
effect, and she grew no larger:  still it was very uncomfortable,
and, as there seemed to be no sort of chance of her ever getting
out of the room again, no wonder she felt unhappy.

  `It was much pleasanter at home,' thought poor Alice, `when one
wasn't always growing larger and smaller, and being ordered about
by mice and rabbits.  I almost wish I hadn't gone down that

          "stanford.edu",
          "state.ca.us",
          "www.state.ca.us",
          "state.ca.us",
          "pvt.k12.ca.us",
          "www.rave.ca.",
          "cnn.ca",
          "ledger-enquirer.com",
          "it-trace.ch",
          "cool.dk",
          "cool.co.uk",
          "cool.de",
          "cool.es",
          "cool\uFF61fr", // Alternate dot character
          "cool.nl",

## 🥙 🤝 ⏮️ ↔

🔜, 🔀 🤝 *➡ 🛠️* 📨 ↔ 📨.

👥 ⚙️ 🎏 `OAuth2PasswordRequestForm`. ⚫️ 🔌 🏠 `scopes` ⏮️ `list` `str`, ⏮️ 🔠 ↔ ⚫️ 📨 📨.

& 👥 📨 ↔ 🍕 🥙 🤝.

/// danger

🦁, 📥 👥 ❎ ↔ 📨 🔗 🤝.

✋️ 👆 🈸, 💂‍♂, 👆 🔜 ⚒ 💭 👆 🕴 🚮 ↔ 👈 👩‍💻 🤙 💪 ✔️, ⚖️ 🕐 👆 ✔️ 🔁.

///

```Python hl_lines="155"
{!../../docs_src/security/tutorial005.py!}
```

Und wir geben die Scopes als Teil des JWT-Tokens zurück.

/// danger | "Gefahr"

Der Einfachheit halber fügen wir hier die empfangenen Scopes direkt zum Token hinzu.

 *
 * <p>Unlike {@code java.util.HashSet}, iteration is only proportional to the actual {@code size()},
 * which is optimal, and <i>not</i> the size of the internal hashtable, which could be much larger
 * than {@code size()}. Furthermore, this structure only depends on a fixed number of arrays; {@code
 * add(x)} operations <i>do not</i> create objects for the garbage collector to deal with, and for

   * Returns an immutable array containing the same values as {@code this} array. This is logically
   * a no-op, and in some circumstances {@code this} itself is returned. However, if this instance
   * is a {@link #subArray} view of a larger array, this method will copy only the appropriate range
   * of values, resulting in an equivalent array with a smaller memory footprint.
   */
  public ImmutableLongArray trimmed() {

In this case, it might not be a problem, because it's the same user sending the password.

But if we use the same model for another *path operation*, we could be sending our user's passwords to every client.

/// danger

Never store the plain password of a user or send it in a response like this, unless you know all the caveats and you know what you are doing.

///

## Add an output model

   * Returns an immutable array containing the same values as {@code this} array. This is logically
   * a no-op, and in some circumstances {@code this} itself is returned. However, if this instance
   * is a {@link #subArray} view of a larger array, this method will copy only the appropriate range
   * of values, resulting in an equivalent array with a smaller memory footprint.
   */
  public ImmutableIntArray trimmed() {

```

////

🔜, 🕐❔ 🖥 🏗 👩‍💻 ⏮️ 🔐, 🛠️ 🔜 📨 🎏 🔐 📨.

👉 💼, ⚫️ 💪 🚫 ⚠, ↩️ ⚫️ 🎏 👩‍💻 📨 🔐.

✋️ 🚥 👥 ⚙️ 🎏 🏷 ➕1️⃣ *➡ 🛠️*, 👥 💪 📨 👆 👩‍💻 🔐 🔠 👩‍💻.

/// danger

🙅 🏪 ✅ 🔐 👩‍💻 ⚖️ 📨 ⚫️ 📨 💖 👉, 🚥 👆 💭 🌐 ⚠ & 👆 💭 ⚫️❔ 👆 🔨.

///

## 🚮 🔢 🏷

👥 💪 ↩️ ✍ 🔢 🏷 ⏮️ 🔢 🔐 & 🔢 🏷 🍵 ⚫️:

//// tab | 🐍 3️⃣.6️⃣ & 🔛

      return list.asList();
    }
    return copyFromCollection(elements);
  }

  @JsMethod
  public static <E> ImmutableList<E> copyOf(E[] elements) {
    checkNotNull(elements); // eager for GWT
    return copyOf(Arrays.asList(elements));
  }

  private static <E> ImmutableList<E> copyFromCollection(Collection<? extends E> collection) {
    Object[] elements = collection.toArray();