go run docs/iam/access-manager-plugin.go &
          make test-iam
      - name: Test MinIO Old Version data to IAM import current version
        if: matrix.ldap == 'ldaphost:389'
        env:
          _MINIO_LDAP_TEST_SERVER: ${{ matrix.ldap }}
        run: |
          make test-iam-ldap-upgrade-import
      - name: Test LDAP for automatic site replication
        if: matrix.ldap == 'localhost:389'

 * graph. The following test cases are left for the subclasses to handle:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Test cases related to whether the graph is directed, undirected, mutable, or immutable.
 *   <li>Test cases related to the specific implementation of the {@link Network} interface.
 * </ul>
 *
 * TODO(user): Make this class generic (using <N, E>) for all node and edge types.

                false);
        assertNotNull(res.get());
    }

    /**
     * This test has
     *   - a dependency directly managed to 0.2
     *   - then a BOM import which manages that same dep to 0.1
     * This <i>currently</i> results in 0.2 and a no warning
     */
    @Test
    void testManagedDependencyBeforeImport() throws Exception {

      )
      .build()
  }

  private fun buildServerSslSocketFactory(): SSLSocketFactory {
    // The test uses JDK default SSL Context instead of the Platform provided one
    // as Conscrypt seems to have some differences, we only want to test client side here.
    return try {
      val keyManager =
        newKeyManager(
          null,
          serverCert,

		secretKey          string
		expectedRespStatus int
	}{
		// Test case - 1.
		// Validate a good case request succeeds.
		{
			bucketName:         bucketName,
			accessKey:          credentials.AccessKey,
			secretKey:          credentials.SecretKey,
			expectedRespStatus: http.StatusOK,
		},
		// Test case - 2.
		// Test case with invalid accessKey to produce and validate Signature Mismatch error.
		{

  /*
   * This is a public type so that the Android test runner can create an instance directly as it
   * insists upon doing. It then runs the test, which behaves exactly like this package's existing
   * PackageSanityTests. (The test would run on the JVM, too, if not for the suppression below, and
   * that would be a problem because it violates small-test rules. Note that we strip the

 */
package jcifs.tests;


import static org.junit.Assert.assertEquals;

import java.io.IOException;
import java.util.Collection;
import java.util.Map;

import org.junit.Test;
import org.junit.runner.RunWith;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized;
import org.junit.runners.Parameterized.Parameters;

import jcifs.smb.SID;


/**
 * @author mbechler
 *
 */

		data, err := testCase.tid.MarshalJSON()
		expectErr := (err != nil)

		if expectErr != testCase.expectErr {
			t.Fatalf("test %v: error: expected: %v, got: %v", i+1, testCase.expectErr, expectErr)
		}

		if !testCase.expectErr {
			if !reflect.DeepEqual(data, testCase.expectedData) {
				t.Fatalf("test %v: data: expected: %v, got: %v", i+1, string(testCase.expectedData), string(data))
			}
		}
	}
}

		data, err := testCase.tid.MarshalJSON()
		expectErr := (err != nil)

		if expectErr != testCase.expectErr {
			t.Fatalf("test %v: error: expected: %v, got: %v", i+1, testCase.expectErr, expectErr)
		}

		if !testCase.expectErr {
			if !reflect.DeepEqual(data, testCase.expectedData) {
				t.Fatalf("test %v: data: expected: %v, got: %v", i+1, string(testCase.expectedData), string(data))
			}
		}
	}
}

     * a:2.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqual() {
        ResolutionNode a1n = createResolutionNode(a1);
        ResolutionNode a2n = createResolutionNode(a2);

        assertResolveConflict(a1n, a1n, a2n);
    }

    /**
     * Tests that <code>a:2.0</code> wins in the scenario:
     * <pre>
     * a:2.0
     * a:1.0
     * </pre>
     */
    @Test
    void testEqualReversed() {