return strconv.FormatUint(v, 10)
	}
	return ""
}

const nestedRelationSplit = "__"

// NestedRelationName nested relationships like `Manager__Company`
func NestedRelationName(prefix, name string) string {
	return prefix + nestedRelationSplit + name
}

// SplitNestedRelationName Split nested relationships to `[]string{"Manager","Company"}`
func SplitNestedRelationName(name string) []string {

import org.gradle.api.DefaultTask;
import org.gradle.api.file.DirectoryProperty;
import org.gradle.api.provider.Property;
import org.gradle.api.tasks.Input;
import org.gradle.api.tasks.InputFiles;
import org.gradle.api.tasks.Nested;
import org.gradle.api.tasks.PathSensitive;
import org.gradle.api.tasks.PathSensitivity;
import org.gradle.api.tasks.TaskAction;
import org.gradle.deployment.internal.DeploymentRegistry;

     * OS family that can be tested for. {@value}
     */
    private static final String FAMILY_OS2 = "os/2";

    /**
     * OS family that can be tested for. {@value}
     */
    private static final String FAMILY_NETWARE = "netware";

    /**
     * OS family that can be tested for. {@value}
     */
    private static final String FAMILY_DOS = "dos";

    /**
     * OS family that can be tested for. {@value}
     */

							}
						} else {
							matchedFieldCount[column] = 1
						}
					} else if names := utils.SplitNestedRelationName(column); len(names) > 1 { // has nested relation
						if rel, ok := sch.Relationships.Relations[names[0]]; ok {
							subNameCount := len(names)
							// nested relation fields
							relFields := make([]*schema.Field, 0, subNameCount-1)
							relFields = append(relFields, rel.Field)

This way, its schema will show up in the API docs user interface:

<img src="/img/tutorial/dataclasses/image01.png">

## Dataclasses in Nested Data Structures

You can also combine `dataclasses` with other type annotations to make nested data structures.

In some cases, you might still have to use Pydantic's version of `dataclasses`. For example, if you have errors with the automatically generated API documentation.

    assertFalse(invokable.isAnnotationPresent(Tested.class));
  }

  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
  private @interface Tested {}

  private abstract static class A {
    @Tested private boolean privateField;
    @Tested int packagePrivateField;
    @Tested protected int protectedField;
    @Tested public String publicField;
    @Tested private static Iterable<String> staticField;

    assertFalse(invokable.isAnnotationPresent(Tested.class));
  }

  @Retention(RetentionPolicy.RUNTIME)
  private @interface Tested {}

  private abstract static class A {
    @Tested private boolean privateField;
    @Tested int packagePrivateField;
    @Tested protected int protectedField;
    @Tested public String publicField;
    @Tested private static Iterable<String> staticField;

It can't handle nested models very well. So, if the JSON body in the request is a JSON object that has inner fields that in turn are nested JSON objects, it cannot be properly documented and validated.

/// check | "Inspired **FastAPI** to"

Use Python types to have great editor support.

   *
   * @throws ParameterNotInstantiableException if the static methods cannot be invoked because the
   *     default value of a parameter cannot be determined.
   * @throws IllegalAccessException if the class isn't public or is nested inside a non-public
   *     class, preventing its methods from being accessible.
   * @throws InvocationTargetException if a static method threw exception.
   */

Explicitly set values have highest priority, then profile settings, then chart defaults.

As an implementation detail of profiles, the default values for the chart are all nested under `defaults`.
When configuring the chart, you should not include this.