*
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at
   * {@link Predicate#apply}. Do not provide a predicate such as {@code
   * Predicates.instanceOf(ArrayList.class)}, which is inconsistent with equals.
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object> Map<K, V> filterKeys(

   * example, {@code [] < [1L] < [1L, 2L] < [2L] < [1L << 63]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(long[],
   * long[])}.
   */
  public static Comparator<long[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;

    table.put('b', 1, "bar");
    table.put('a', 2, "baz");
    validateTableCopies(table);
    // Even though rowKeySet, columnKeySet, and cellSet have the same
    // iteration ordering, row has an inconsistent ordering.
    assertThat(table.row('b').keySet()).containsExactly(1, 2).inOrder();
    assertThat(ImmutableTable.copyOf(table).row('b').keySet()).containsExactly(2, 1).inOrder();
  }

replication status is reflected as `PENDING`.

If 3 or more targets are participating in active-active replication, the replication configuration for replica metadata sync, delete marker replication and delete replication should match to avoid inconsistent picture between the clusters. It is not recommended to turn on asymmetric replication - for e.g. if three sites A,B,C are participating in replication, it would be better to avoid replication setups like A -> [B, C], B -> A. In this particular...

   * copy.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> {@code keyPredicate} must be <i>consistent with equals</i>, as documented at
   * {@link Predicate#apply}. Do not provide a predicate such as {@code
   * Predicates.instanceOf(ArrayList.class)}, which is inconsistent with equals.
   *
   * @since 11.0
   */

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * lesser. For example, {@code [] < [false] < [false, true] < [true]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(boolean[],
   * boolean[])}.
   *
   * @since 2.0
   */
  public static Comparator<boolean[]> lexicographicalComparator() {

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   */
  public static Comparator<int[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;
  }

   * example, {@code [] < [1] < [1, 2] < [2] < [1 << 31]}.
   *
   * <p>The returned comparator is inconsistent with {@link Object#equals(Object)} (since arrays
   * support only identity equality), but it is consistent with {@link Arrays#equals(int[], int[])}.
   */
  public static Comparator<int[]> lexicographicalComparator() {
    return LexicographicalComparator.INSTANCE;
  }

        }
        checkArgument(
            fromParameterizedType.getRawType().equals(toParameterizedType.getRawType()),
            "Inconsistent raw type: %s vs. %s",
            fromParameterizedType,
            to);
        Type[] fromArgs = fromParameterizedType.getActualTypeArguments();
        Type[] toArgs = toParameterizedType.getActualTypeArguments();