String path = htmlNext.getRoutingPath();
                        assertTrue("Admin field should have /admin/ path: " + fieldName + " -> " + path, path.startsWith("/admin/"));
                        adminPaths.add(path);
                    }
                }
            }
        }
        assertTrue("Should have admin paths", adminPaths.size() > 0);
    }

    @Test

        try {
            throw exception;
        } catch (DataStoreException e) {
            assertEquals("Serialization test", e.getMessage());
        } catch (Exception e) {
            fail("Should have caught DataStoreException");
        }
    }

    @Test
    public void test_inheritance() {
        // Test inheritance hierarchy
        DataStoreException exception = new DataStoreException("Test");

        String output = thread.getOutput();
        assertTrue("Should contain recent lines", output.contains("line5"));

        assertTrue("Should have line3", thread.contains("line3"));
        assertTrue("Should have line4", thread.contains("line4"));
        assertTrue("Should have line5", thread.contains("line5"));
    }

    @Test
    public void test_emptyInputStream() throws IOException, InterruptedException {

        } catch (LdapConfigurationException e) {
            assertEquals(errorMessage, e.getMessage());
            assertNull(e.getCause());
        } catch (Exception e) {
            fail("Should have caught LdapConfigurationException");
        }
    }

    @Test
    public void test_throwAndCatchAsFessSystemException() {
        // Test catching as parent exception type

Doing this provides the following specific benefits:
- **Reduce the API surface** - We no longer need to maintain two methods.
- **Consistency** - All languages have consistent access to the same APIs and ergonomics in the DSL.
- **Reduce the size of the Gradle distribution** - We no longer need to carry multiple standard libraries for different languages.

## Decision

        if (labels != null && !labels.isEmpty()) {
            Map<String, Object> firstLabel = labels.get(0);
            assertTrue(firstLabel.containsKey("label"), "Label should have 'label' property");
            assertTrue(firstLabel.containsKey("value"), "Label should have 'value' property");
        }
    }

    private static String createLabel(final String name, final String value) {

        assertTrue(logs.size() > 0, "Should have at least one job log");

        // Verify response structure
        Integer status = JsonPath.from(response).get("response.status");
        assertEquals(0, status);

        // Verify log structure
        Map<String, Object> firstLog = logs.get(0);
        assertTrue(firstLog.containsKey("id"), "Log should have id field");

        // Verify that multiple threads were processed
        assertTrue("Should process at least one thread", threadCount.get() >= 1);
        assertTrue("Should have stack trace elements", stackTraceCount.get() > 0);
        assertTrue("Should have more stack traces than threads", stackTraceCount.get() > threadCount.get());
    }

    @Test
    public void test_processThreadDump_withException() {

            }
        };

        assertEquals("Custom message should match", "Test message", customAnnotation.message());
        assertEquals("Custom groups should have one element", 1, customAnnotation.groups().length);
        assertEquals("Custom payload should have one element", 1, customAnnotation.payload().length);
        assertEquals("Custom minKey should match", "custom.min", customAnnotation.minKey());

## Architecture Standards

**Experimental!**

We'd like to capture our architectural decisions about the build tool as [Architectural Decision Records (ADRs)](https://adr.github.io/).
For now we just have this global repository of ADRs.
If we see fit, we can break these out to per-platform ones, or keep a hybrid approach to having global and platform-specific ADSs.

Our aim is to keep the process lightweight and approachable.