//// tab | Test

### Develop a webapp - a tutorial { #develop-a-webapp-a-tutorial }

Hello.

### Type hints and -annotations { #type-hints-and-annotations }

Hello again.

### Super- and subclasses { #super-and-subclasses }

Hello again.

////

//// tab | Info

The only hard rule for headings is that the LLM leaves the hash part inside curly brackets unchanged, which ensures that links do not break.

/**
 * A request to collect the transitive dependencies and to build a dependency graph from them. There are three ways to
 * create a dependency graph. First, only the root dependency can be given. Second, a root dependency and direct
 * dependencies can be specified in which case the specified direct dependencies are merged with the direct dependencies
 * retrieved from the artifact descriptor of the root dependency. And last, only direct dependencies can be specified in

   * String.class}, then {@code new TypeResolver().where(formal, actual)} will {@linkplain
   * #resolveType resolve} {@code ParameterizedType List<T>} to {@code List<String>}, and resolve
   * {@code Map<T, Something>} to {@code Map<String, Something>} etc. Similarly, {@code formal} and
   * {@code actual} can be {@code Map<K, V>} and {@code Map<String, Integer>} respectively, or they

 *       {@link #verifyNotNull(Object)} and {@link Preconditions#checkNotNull(Object)} perform the
 *       same function with more clarity.
 * </ul>
 *
 * <h3>Warning about performance</h3>
 *
 * <p>Remember that parameter values for message construction must all be computed eagerly, and
 * autoboxing and varargs array creation may happen as well, even when the verification succeeds and

 * largely defined by its supertype.
 *
 * <p>For field types and method return types, you should generally use the immutable type (such as
 * {@link ImmutableList}) instead of the general collection interface type (such as {@link List}).
 * This communicates to your callers all of the semantic guarantees listed above, which is almost
 * always very useful information.
 *

      <description>
        This is the file specification used to activate a profile. The missing value will be the location
        of a file that needs to exist, and if it doesn't the profile must run.  On the other hand exists will test
        for the existence of the file and if it is there will run the profile.
      </description>
      <fields>
        <field>
          <name>missing</name>
          <version>1.0.0+</version>

</p>

<pre>
const (
	AAND = obj.ABaseARM + obj.A_ARCHSPECIFIC + iota
	AEOR
	ASUB
	ARSB
	AADD
	...
</pre>

<p>
This is the list of instructions and their spellings as known to the assembler and linker for that architecture.
Each instruction begins with an initial capital <code>A</code> in this list, so <code>AAND</code>
represents the bitwise and instruction,

  /**
   * Ignored due to incompatibilities between Android and Java on how non-ASCII subject alt names
   * are parsed. Android fails to parse these, which means we fall back to the CN. The RI does parse
   * them, so the CN is unused.
   */
  @Test fun verifyNonAsciiSubjectAlt() {
    // Expecting actual:
    //  ["bar.com", "花子.co.jp"]
    // to contain exactly (and in same order):
    //  ["bar.com", "������.co.jp"]

   * String.class}, then {@code new TypeResolver().where(formal, actual)} will {@linkplain
   * #resolveType resolve} {@code ParameterizedType List<T>} to {@code List<String>}, and resolve
   * {@code Map<T, Something>} to {@code Map<String, Something>} etc. Similarly, {@code formal} and
   * {@code actual} can be {@code Map<K, V>} and {@code Map<String, Integer>} respectively, or they

</p>

<pre>
A0, A1, and []string
A2 and struct{ a, b int }
A3 and int
A4, func(int, float64) *[]string, and A5

B0 and C0
D0[int, string] and E0
[]int and []int
struct{ a, b *B5 } and struct{ a, b *B5 }
func(x int, y float64) *[]string, func(int, float64) (result *[]string), and A5
</pre>

<p>
<code>B0</code> and <code>B1</code> are different because they are new types