*         1970 as a <code>long</code> value
     * @throws CIFSException
     */
    long createTime () throws CIFSException;


    /**
     * Create a new file but fail if it already exists. The check for
     * existence of the file and it's creation are an atomic operation with
     * respect to other filesystem activities.
     * 
     * @throws CIFSException
     */

     * empty at any point. (The sum ensures accuracy up through at least 1<<31 per-segment
     * modifications before recheck.)  Method containsValue() uses similar constructions for
     * stability checks.
     */
    long sum = 0L;
    Segment<K, V, E, S>[] segments = this.segments;
    for (int i = 0; i < segments.length; ++i) {
      if (segments[i].count != 0) {
        return false;
      }

     * empty at any point. (The sum ensures accuracy up through at least 1<<31 per-segment
     * modifications before recheck.)  Method containsValue() uses similar constructions for
     * stability checks.
     */
    long sum = 0L;
    Segment<K, V, E, S>[] segments = this.segments;
    for (int i = 0; i < segments.length; ++i) {
      if (segments[i].count != 0) {
        return false;
      }

{!../../docs_src/sql_databases/sql_app/crud.py!}
```

/// tip

🏗 🔢 👈 🕴 💡 🔗 ⏮️ 💽 (🤚 👩‍💻 ⚖️ 🏬) 🔬 👆 *➡ 🛠️ 🔢*, 👆 💪 🌖 💪 ♻ 👫 💗 🍕 &amp; 🚮 <abbr title="Automated tests, written in code, that check if another piece of code is working correctly.">⚒ 💯</abbr> 👫.

///

### ✍ 💽

🔜 ✍ 🚙 🔢 ✍ 💽.

🔁:

* ✍ 🇸🇲 🏷 *👐* ⏮️ 👆 📊.
* `add` 👈 👐 🎚 👆 💽 🎉.
* `commit` 🔀 💽 (👈 👫 🖊).

	g()
}
</pre>

<p>
it can happen that <code>g</code> prints <code>2</code> and then <code>0</code>.
</p>

<p>
This fact invalidates a few common idioms.
</p>

<p>
Double-checked locking is an attempt to avoid the overhead of synchronization.
For example, the <code>twoprint</code> program might be
incorrectly written as:
</p>

<pre>
var a string
var done bool

func setup() {

				<exclusion>
					<groupId>com.google.j2objc</groupId>
					<artifactId>j2objc-annotations</artifactId>
				</exclusion>
				<exclusion>
					<groupId>org.checkerframework</groupId>
					<artifactId>checker-qual</artifactId>
				</exclusion>
				<exclusion>
					<groupId>com.google.code.findbugs</groupId>
					<artifactId>jsr305</artifactId>
				</exclusion>
				<exclusion>

   *     my_add2 = b + b
   *     return my_add1, my_add2
   *
   * Now we will execute this function with an eager context:
   *
   *   output1, output2 = two_adds(2.0, 3.0)
   *
   * and check that we got 5.0 and 6.0 as results.
   */

  // Build eager context.
  TFE_ContextOptions* opts = TFE_NewContextOptions();
  TFE_ContextOptionsSetTfrt(opts, std::get<1>(GetParam()));

For new clusters if you have not configured the cgroup driver explicitly you might get a failure in the `kubelet` on driver mismatch (kubeadm clusters should be using the `systemd` driver). Also remove the `IsDockerSystemdCheck` preflight check (warning) that checks if the Docker cgroup driver is set to `systemd`. Ideally such detection / coordination should be on the side of CRI implementers and the kubelet (tracked [here](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/issues/99808)). Please see the [pa...

import java.util.Set;
import java.util.Vector;
import junit.framework.AssertionFailedError;
import junit.framework.Test;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import junit.framework.TestSuite;
import org.checkerframework.checker.nullness.qual.Nullable;

/**
 * Unit test for {@code Iterators}.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault

次のようなユーザーインターフェイスが表示されます：

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image07.png">

前回と同じ方法でアプリケーションの認可を行います。

次の認証情報を使用します：

Username: `johndoe`
Password: `secret`

/// check | "確認"

コードのどこにも平文のパスワード"`secret`"はなく、ハッシュ化されたものしかないことを確認してください。

///

<img src="/img/tutorial/security/image08.png">

エンドポイント`/users/me/`を呼び出すと、次のようなレスポンスが得られます：

```JSON
{