* of the same class. For example, if sublists of {@code MyList} instances were serializable,
   * those sublists might implement a private {@code MySubList} type but serialize as a plain {@code
   * MyList} to save space. So long as {@code MyList} has all the public supertypes of {@code
   * MySubList}, this is safe. For these cases, for which {@code reserializeAndAssert} is too
   * strict, use {@link #reserialize}.
   *

 *       Guava while continuing to run it internally, as we do with many other tests. This would
 *       suffice because we our Android users and tests are using the open-source version, which
 *       would no longer have the problematic test. But why bother when we can instead strip it with
 *       a more precisely named annotation?
 *   <li>While a dependency on Android ought to be easy if it's for annotations only, it will

import java.net.ProtocolException

/**
 * Handles basic types that always use the same tag. This supports optional types and may set a type
 * hint for further adapters to process.
 *
 * Types like ANY and CHOICE that don't have a consistent tag cannot use this.
 */
internal data class BasicDerAdapter<T>(
  private val name: String,
  /** The tag class this adapter expects, or -1 to match any tag class. */
  val tagClass: Int,

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

        /*
         * We wish to test whether or not x <= (sqrtFloor + 0.5)^2 = halfSquare + 0.25. Since both x
         * and halfSquare are integers, this is equivalent to testing whether or not x <=
         * halfSquare. (We have to deal with overflow, though.)
         *
         * If we treat halfSquare as an unsigned long, we know that
         *            sqrtFloor^2 <= x < (sqrtFloor + 1)^2

// but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
// MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE.  See the
// GNU Affero General Public License for more details.
//
// You should have received a copy of the GNU Affero General Public License
// along with this program.  If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.

package cmd

import (
	"bufio"
	"context"
	"encoding/binary"
	"encoding/hex"

        try {
          assertEquals(b + "^" + k, force32(expectedResult.intValue()), IntMath.checkedPow(b, k));
          assertTrue(b + "^" + k + " should have succeeded", expectedSuccess);
        } catch (ArithmeticException e) {
          assertFalse(b + "^" + k + " should have failed", expectedSuccess);
        }
      }
    }
  }

  @AndroidIncompatible // slow
  @GwtIncompatible // TODO

}

@Throws(EOFException::class)
private fun Buffer.readChallengeHeader(result: MutableList<Challenge>) {
  var peek: String? = null

  while (true) {
    // Read a scheme name for this challenge if we don't have one already.
    if (peek == null) {
      skipCommasAndWhitespace()
      peek = readToken()
      if (peek == null) return
    }

    val schemeName = peek

otherwise indicated below, the terms and conditions of the EPL still apply to any source code in the Content and such source code may be obtained at http://www.eclipse.org/ http://www.eclipse.org. Third Party Content The Content includes items that have been sourced from third parties as set out below. If you did not receive this Content directly from the Eclipse Foundation, the following is provided for informational purposes only, and you should look to the Redistributor's license for terms and...