.build();

    try (Response response = client.newCall(request).execute()) {
      if (!response.isSuccessful()) throw new IOException("Unexpected code " + response);

      Headers responseHeaders = response.headers();
      for (int i = 0; i < responseHeaders.size(); i++) {
        System.out.println(responseHeaders.name(i) + ": " + responseHeaders.value(i));
      }

      System.out.println(response.body().string());

        // of
        // InputStream.read(byte[], int, int)
        // See https://github.com/google/guava/issues/3542
        Reader reader = new StringReader(cannotDecode);
        InputStream decodingStream = encoding.decodingStream(reader);
        try {
          ByteStreams.exhaust(decodingStream);
          fail("Expected DecodingException");
        } catch (DecodingException expected) {

    assertThat(response.protocol).isEqualTo(protocol)
    val logs = testLogHandler.takeAll()
    assertThat(firstFrame(logs, "HEADERS")!!, "header logged")
      .contains("HEADERS       END_HEADERS")
    // While MockWebServer waits to read the client's HEADERS frame before sending the response, it
    // doesn't wait to read the client's DATA frame and may send a DATA frame before the client

      @Override
      String read(ByteSource byteSource, Charset cs) throws IOException {
        StringBuilder sb = new StringBuilder();
        try (InputStreamReader reader = new InputStreamReader(byteSource.openStream(), cs)) {
          CharStreams.copy(reader, sb);
        }
        return sb.toString();
      }
    },
    // It really seems like this should be faster than TO_BYTE_ARRAY_NEW_STRING.  But it just isn't

{
    "dynamic_templates": [
      {
        "headers": {
          "path_match": "headers.*",
          "mapping": {
            "type": "keyword"
          }
        }
      },
      {
        "search_fields": {
          "path_match": "searchField.*",
          "mapping": {
            "type": "keyword"
          }
        }
      },
      {
        "documents": {
          "path_match": "documents.*",

)

var magicHeaders = []struct {
	header []byte
	f      format
}{
	{
		header: []byte{0x1f, 0x8b, 8},
		f:      formatGzip,
	},
	{
		// Zstd default header.
		header: []byte{0x28, 0xb5, 0x2f, 0xfd},
		f:      formatZstd,
	},
	{
		// Zstd skippable frame header.
		header: []byte{0x2a, 0x4d, 0x18},
		f:      formatZstd,
	},
	{
		// LZ4
		header: []byte{0x4, 0x22, 0x4d, 0x18},

					i, o, l, skip, sn, ps, oRef, lRef, skipRef, snRef, psRef)
			}
		}
	}
}

var getDefaultOptsTests = []struct {
	headers        http.Header
	copySource     bool
	metadata       map[string]string
	encryptionType encrypt.Type
	err            error
}{
	{
		headers: http.Header{
			xhttp.AmzServerSideEncryptionCustomerAlgorithm: []string{"AES256"},

**FastAPI** will use that *temporal* response to extract the cookies (also headers and status code), and will put them in the final response that contains the value you returned, filtered by any `response_model`.

You can also declare the `Response` parameter in dependencies, and set cookies (and headers) in them.

## Return a `Response` directly { #return-a-response-directly }

Symmetrically, interceptors can rewrite response headers and transform the response body. This is generally more dangerous than rewriting request headers because it may violate the webserver's expectations!

If you're in a tricky situation and prepared to deal with the consequences, rewriting response headers is a powerful way to work around problems. For example, you can fix a server's misconfigured `Cache-Control` response header to enable better response caching:

   *
   * Otherwise if the response has a `Content-Type` header that specifies a charset, that is used
   * to determine the charset of the response bytes.
   *
   * Otherwise the response bytes are decoded as UTF-8.
   */
  fun charStream(): Reader =
    reader ?: BomAwareReader(source(), charset()).also {
      reader = it
    }

  /**
   * Returns the response as a string.
   *