}
  }

  /**
   * Returns a {@link Collection} of all the permutations of the specified {@link Collection}.
   *
   * <p><i>Notes:</i> This is an implementation of the Plain Changes algorithm for permutations
   * generation, described in Knuth's "The Art of Computer Programming", Volume 4, Chapter 7,
   * Section 7.2.1.2.
   *

---

"_Je suis très enthousiaste à propos de **FastAPI**. C'est un bonheur !_"

---

"_Estoy súper emocionado con **FastAPI**. ¡Es tan divertido!_"

---

"_我對 **FastAPI** 興奮得不得了。它太有趣了！_"

---

"*Estou extremamente entusiasmado com o **FastAPI**. É tão divertido!*"

 * Benchmarks (as of December 2011) show that:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>for an unnested {@code lock()} and {@code unlock()}, a cycle detecting lock takes 38ns as
 *       opposed to the 24ns taken by a plain lock.
 *   <li>for nested locking, the cost increases with the depth of the nesting:
 *       <ul>
 *         <li>2 levels: average of 64ns per lock()/unlock()
 *         <li>3 levels: average of 77ns per lock()/unlock()

---

"_Я в полном восторге от **FastAPI**. Это так весело!_"

         * However, we don't expose currentFuture to users, so they can't attach listeners. And the
         * Future might not even be a ListenableFuture, just a plain Future. That said, similar
         * problems can exist with methods like FutureTask.done(), not to mention slow calls to
         * Thread.interrupt() (as discussed in InterruptibleTask). At the end of the day, it's

  fun getContentTypeConnects() {
    server.enqueue(
      MockResponse(
        headers = headersOf("Content-Type", "text/plain"),
        body = "ABC",
      ),
    )
    val response = getResponse(newRequest("/"))
    assertThat(response.body.contentType()).isEqualTo(
      "text/plain".toMediaType(),
    )
    response.body.close()
  }

  @Test
  fun getContentEncodingConnects() {

---

"_**FastAPI** için ayın üzerindeymişcesine heyecanlıyım. Çok eğlenceli!_"