return Response(content="Foo")


@app.get("/no_response_model-annotation_json_response_class")
def no_response_model_annotation_json_response_class() -> JSONResponse:
    return JSONResponse(content={"foo": "bar"})


client = TestClient(app)


def test_no_response_model_no_annotation_return_model():
    response = client.get("/no_response_model-no_annotation-return_model")

        // Exactly 1 colon. Split into host:port.
        host = hostPortString.substring(0, colonPos);
        portString = hostPortString.substring(colonPos + 1);
      } else {
        // 0 or 2+ colons. Bare hostname or IPv6 literal.
        host = hostPortString;
        hasBracketlessColons = colonPos >= 0;
      }
    }

    Integer port;
    if (isNullOrEmpty(portString)) {
      port = NO_PORT;

	}

	tests := []struct {
		pkg  string
		want bool
	}{
		{"net/http", true},
		{"net/http/internal-foo", true},
		{"net/http/internal", false},
		{"net/http/internal/bar", false},
		{"internal/foo", false},
		{"internal", false},
	}
	for _, tt := range tests {
		got := !internalPkg.MatchString(tt.pkg)
		if got != tt.want {

 * for the following multimap definition:
 *
 * {@snippet :
 * Multimap<K, V> multimap = LinkedListMultimap.create();
 * multimap.put(key1, foo);
 * multimap.put(key2, bar);
 * multimap.put(key1, baz);
 * }
 *
 * ... the iteration order for {@link #keys()} is {@code [key1, key2, key1]}, and similarly for

///

#### 기본값이 있는 필드에 값이 있는 데이터 { #data-with-values-for-fields-with-defaults }

하지만 ID가 `bar`인 항목처럼, 기본값이 있는 모델의 필드에 값이 있다면:

```Python hl_lines="3  5"
{
    "name": "Bar",
    "description": "The bartenders",
    "price": 62,
    "tax": 20.2
}
```

응답에 포함됩니다.

 *
 * <p>Using {@link Comparator} avoids certain types of bugs, for example when you meant to write
 * {@code .compare(a.foo, b.foo)} but you actually wrote {@code .compare(a.foo, a.foo)} or {@code
 * .compare(a.foo, b.bar)}. {@code ComparisonChain} also has a potential performance problem that
 * {@code Comparator} doesn't: it evaluates all the parameters of all the {@code .compare} calls,

   * @param max the upper bound (inclusive) of the range to constrain {@code value} to
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code min > max}
   * @since 21.0
   */
  // A call to bare "min" or "max" would resolve to our varargs method, not to any static import.
  @SuppressWarnings("StaticImportPreferred")
  public static int constrainToRange(int value, int min, int max) {

 *
 * <p>Using {@link Comparator} avoids certain types of bugs, for example when you meant to write
 * {@code .compare(a.foo, b.foo)} but you actually wrote {@code .compare(a.foo, a.foo)} or {@code
 * .compare(a.foo, b.bar)}. {@code ComparisonChain} also has a potential performance problem that
 * {@code Comparator} doesn't: it evaluates all the parameters of all the {@code .compare} calls,

    }

    protected ArtifactRepository badRemoteRepository() throws Exception {
        return artifactRepositoryFactory.createArtifactRepository(
                "test", "http://foo.bar/repository", repoLayout, null, null);
    }

    protected void assertRemoteArtifactPresent(Artifact artifact) throws Exception {
        ArtifactRepository remoteRepo = remoteRepository();

///

#### 默认字段有实际值的数据 { #data-with-values-for-fields-with-defaults }

但是，如果你的数据在具有默认值的模型字段中有实际的值，例如 ID 为 `bar` 的项：

```Python hl_lines="3  5"
{
    "name": "Bar",
    "description": "The bartenders",
    "price": 62,
    "tax": 20.2
}
```

这些值将包含在响应中。

#### 具有与默认值相同值的数据 { #data-with-the-same-values-as-the-defaults }