* comes from a data structure supporting efficient indexed random access, typically an array or
   * list.
   *
   * <p>The order of the resulting stream is defined if and only if the order of the original stream
   * was defined.
   */
  public static <T extends @Nullable Object, R extends @Nullable Object> Stream<R> mapWithIndex(

    }

    @Override
    public E[] createArray(int length) {
      return gen.createArray(length);
    }

    @Override
    public Iterable<E> order(List<E> insertionOrder) {
      return gen.order(insertionOrder);
    }
  }

  private static Set<Feature<?>> computeReserializedCollectionFeatures(Set<Feature<?>> features) {
    Set<Feature<?>> derivedFeatures = new HashSet<>(features);

                  public List<String> order(List<String> insertionOrder) {
                    List<String> order = new ArrayList<>();
                    for (String s : insertionOrder) {
                      int index = order.indexOf(s);
                      if (index == -1) {
                        order.add(s);
                      } else {
                        order.add(index, s);
                      }

   *         .put(2, 'A', "baz")
   *         .buildOrThrow();
   * }
   *
   * <p>By default, the order in which cells are added to the builder determines the iteration
   * ordering of all views in the returned table, with {@link #putAll} following the {@link
   * Table#cellSet()} iteration order. However, if {@link #orderRowsBy} or {@link #orderColumnsBy}
   * is called, the views are sorted by the supplied comparators.
   *

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Utilities for benchmarks.
 *
 * <p>In many cases, we wish to vary the order of magnitude of the input as much as we want to vary
 * the input itself, so most methods which generate values use an exponential distribution varying
 * the order of magnitude of the generated values uniformly at random.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@NullUnmarked
final class MathBenchmarking {

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A utility for testing an Iterator implementation by comparing its behavior to that of a "known
 * good" reference implementation. In order to accomplish this, it's important to test a great
 * variety of sequences of the {@link Iterator#next}, {@link Iterator#hasNext} and {@link
 * Iterator#remove} operations. This utility takes the brute-force approach of trying <i>all</i>

 *
 * @since 4.0.0
 */
@Experimental
@Consumer
public interface VersionRangeResolver extends Service {

    /**
     * Expands a version range to a list of matching versions, in ascending order.
     * For example, resolves "[3.8,4.0)" to "3.8", "3.8.1", "3.8.2".
     * The returned list of versions is only dependent on the configured repositories and their contents.

 *
 * <p>
 * The factory maintains a map of keys to an array of {@link Extractor} objects.
 * When multiple extractors are associated with a single key, they are sorted by weight
 * in descending order. The {@link #getExtractor(String)} method returns a composite
 * extractor that iterates through the available extractors until one successfully
 * extracts the data.
 * </p>
 *
 * <p>

	q.db.Limit(limit)
	return q
}

func (q *preloadBuilder) Offset(offset int) PreloadBuilder {
	q.db.Offset(offset)
	return q
}

func (q *preloadBuilder) Order(value interface{}) PreloadBuilder {
	q.db.Order(value)
	return q
}

func (q *preloadBuilder) LimitPerRecord(num int) PreloadBuilder {
	q.limitPerRecord = num
	return q
}

      },
      "queryId": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "userSessionId": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "url": {
        "type": "keyword"
      },
      "order": {
        "type": "integer"
      },
      "requestedAt": {
        "type": "date",
        "format": "date_optional_time"
      },
      "queryRequestedAt": {
        "type": "date",