*/

package com.google.common.base;

import com.google.caliper.Benchmark;

/**
 * Some microbenchmarks for the {@link com.google.common.base.Objects} class.
 *
 * @author Ben L. Titzer
 */
public class ObjectsBenchmark {

  private static final Integer I0 = -45;
  private static final Integer I1 = -1;
  private static final Integer I2 = 3;
  private static final String S0 = "3";

Sie können `json_schema_extra` setzen, mit einem `dict`, das alle zusätzlichen Daten enthält, die im generierten JSON-Schema angezeigt werden sollen, einschließlich `examples`.

////

//// tab | Pydantic v1

 *
 * <p>The {@link #count} and {@link #size} implementations all iterate across the set returned by
 * {@link Multiset#entrySet()}, as do many methods acting on the set returned by {@link
 * #elementSet()}. Override those methods for better performance.
 *
 * @author Kevin Bourrillion
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
@GwtCompatible
@ElementTypesAreNonnullByDefault
abstract class AbstractMultiset<E extends @Nullable Object> extends AbstractCollection<E>

                            resolved = conflictResolver.resolveConflict(previous, node);
                        }

                        if (resolved == null) {
                            // TODO add better exception that can detail the two conflicting artifacts
                            ArtifactResolutionException are = new ArtifactResolutionException(

import org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.metadata.Snapshot;
import org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.metadata.SnapshotVersion;
import org.apache.maven.artifact.repository.metadata.Versioning;
import org.eclipse.aether.artifact.Artifact;

/**
 * Maven local GAV level metadata.
 *
 * @deprecated since 4.0.0, use {@code maven-api-impl} jar instead
 */
@Deprecated(since = "4.0.0")

		Err:     "requested functionality is not supported",
	}
)

// Error is a KMS error that can be translated into an S3 API error.
//
// It does not implement the standard error Unwrap interface for
// better error log messages.
type Error struct {
	Code    int    // The HTTP status code returned to the client
	APICode string // The API error code identifying the error
	Err     string // The error message returned to the client

		t.Fatal("addr2line output must have 2 lines")
	}
	funcname = f[0]
	pathAndLineNo := f[1]
	f = strings.Split(pathAndLineNo, ":")
	if runtime.GOOS == "windows" && len(f) == 3 {
		// Reattach drive letter.
		f = []string{f[0] + ":" + f[1], f[2]}
	}
	if len(f) != 2 {
		t.Fatalf("no line number found in %q", pathAndLineNo)
	}
	return funcname, f[0], f[1]
}

const symName = "cmd/addr2line.TestAddr2Line"

					field.ReflectValueOf(ctx, value).Set(reflectV.Elem())
					return
				} else {
					err = setter(ctx, value, reflectV.Elem().Interface())
				}
			} else if valuer, ok := v.(driver.Valuer); ok {
				if v, err = valuer.Value(); err == nil {
					err = setter(ctx, value, v)
				}
			} else if _, ok := v.(clause.Expr); !ok {

### Is concurrency better than parallelism?

Nope! That's not the moral of the story.

Concurrency is different than parallelism. And it is better on **specific** scenarios that involve a lot of waiting. Because of that, it generally is a lot better than parallelism for web application development. But not for everything.

			return '0'
		case r == '_', r == '$':
			return r
		default:
			valid = false
			return -1
		}
	}, name)

	if valid {
		// check for simple name or quoted name
		// - letter/underscore followed by one or more letter/digit/underscore
		// - any text between quotes (text cannot contain a quote itself)
		if match, err := regexp.MatchString("^[a_][a0_$]*$", cleaned); err != nil {
			return err
		} else if match {