import com.google.j2objc.annotations.ReflectionSupport;
import java.util.Set;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicIntegerFieldUpdater;
import java.util.concurrent.atomic.AtomicReferenceFieldUpdater;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import org.jspecify.annotations.Nullable;

/**
 * A helper which does some thread-safe operations for aggregate futures, which must be implemented
 * differently in GWT. Namely:
 *
 * <ul>

import java.util.ArrayDeque;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collections;
import java.util.List;
import java.util.Queue;
import java.util.concurrent.Executor;
import java.util.logging.Level;

/**
 * A list of listeners for implementing a concurrency friendly observable object.
 *
 * <p>Listeners are registered once via {@link #addListener} and then may be invoked by {@linkplain

 */
package okhttp3.mockwebserver

import java.io.Closeable
import java.io.IOException
import java.net.InetAddress
import java.net.Proxy
import java.util.concurrent.TimeUnit
import java.util.logging.Level
import java.util.logging.Logger
import javax.net.ServerSocketFactory
import javax.net.ssl.SSLSocketFactory
import okhttp3.HttpUrl
import okhttp3.Protocol
import org.junit.rules.ExternalResource

                        } catch (final SmbException se) {
                            if (LogStream.level >= 2) {
                                SmbTransport.log.println("Failed validate DC: " + dc_list[i]);
                                if (LogStream.level > 2) {
                                    se.printStackTrace(SmbTransport.log);
                                }
                            }

handlers = java.util.logging.ConsoleHandler

example, RAID6 can protect against two drive failure whereas in MinIO erasure code you can lose as many as half of drives and still the data remains safe. Further, MinIO's erasure code is at the object level and can heal one object at a time. For RAID, healing can be done only at the volume level which translates into high downtime. As MinIO encodes each object individually, it can heal objects incrementally. Storage servers once deployed should not require drive replacement or healing for the lifetime...

import java.util.List;
import java.util.Locale;
import java.util.TreeMap;
import java.util.logging.Level;
import java.util.logging.Logger;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;
import org.junit.Test;

/**
 * Automatically runs sanity checks against top level classes in the same package of the test that
 * extends {@code AbstractPackageSanityTests}. Currently sanity checks include {@link

  @Deprecated(
    message = "moved to val",
    replaceWith = ReplaceWith(expression = "url"),
    level = DeprecationLevel.ERROR,
  )
  fun url(): HttpUrl = url

  @JvmName("-deprecated_method")
  @Deprecated(
    message = "moved to val",
    replaceWith = ReplaceWith(expression = "method"),
    level = DeprecationLevel.ERROR,
  )
  fun method(): String = method

  @JvmName("-deprecated_headers")

	for _, trimString := range trimStrings {
		f = strings.TrimPrefix(filepath.ToSlash(f), filepath.ToSlash(trimString))
	}
	return filepath.FromSlash(f)
}

func getSource(level int) string {
	pc, file, lineNumber, ok := runtime.Caller(level)
	if ok {
		// Clean up the common prefixes
		file = trimTrace(file)
		_, funcName := filepath.Split(runtime.FuncForPC(pc).Name())

    AndroidCertificateChainCleaner.buildIfSupported(trustManager) ?: super.buildCertificateChainCleaner(trustManager)

  override fun log(
    message: String,
    level: Int,
    t: Throwable?,
  ) {
    if (level == WARN) {
      Log.w(Tag, message, t)
    } else {
      Log.i(Tag, message, t)
    }
  }

  companion object {