# ----------------------------------------------------------
#                                                      Mail
#                                                     ------
# Does it send mock mail? (true: no send actually, logging only)
mail.send.mock = false

# SMTP server settings for main: host:port
mail.smtp.server.main.host.and.port = localhost:25

# The prefix of subject to show test environment or not

# ----------------------------------------------------------
#                                                      Mail
#                                                     ------
# Does it send mock mail? (true: no send actually, logging only)
mail.send.mock = false

# SMTP server settings for main: host:port
mail.smtp.server.main.host.and.port = localhost:25

# The prefix of subject to show test environment or not

 * {@link #enqueue} and {@link #dispatch} are 2 different methods. It is expected that the decision
 * to run a particular event is made during the state change, but the decision to actually invoke
 * the listeners can be delayed slightly so that locks can be dropped. Also, because {@link
 * #dispatch} is expected to be called concurrently, it is idempotent.
 */
@J2ktIncompatible
@GwtIncompatible

   * despite the @IgnoreJRERequirement annotation there. My assumption is that, because javac
   * generates a synthetic method for the body of the lambda, the actual method calls that Animal
   * Sniffer is flagging don't appear inside toImmutableSortedMultiset but rather inside that
   * synthetic method. By moving those calls to a named method, we're able to apply

  // +optional
  optional k8s.io.apimachinery.pkg.apis.meta.v1.ObjectMeta metadata = 1;

  // value represents the integer value of this priority class. This is the actual priority that pods
  // receive when they have the name of this class in their pod spec.
  optional int32 value = 2;

  // globalDefault specifies whether this PriorityClass should be considered as

   * list (counter-intuitive, but mathematically consistent).
   *
   * <p><i>Performance notes:</i> while the cartesian product of lists of size {@code m, n, p} is a
   * list of size {@code m x n x p}, its actual memory consumption is much smaller. When the
   * cartesian product is constructed, the input lists are merely copied. Only as the resulting list

 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>Implementations can be generally assumed to prioritize memory efficiency, then speed of
 *       access, and lastly speed of creation.
 *   <li>The {@code copyOf} methods will sometimes recognize that the actual copy operation is
 *       unnecessary; for example, {@code copyOf(copyOf(anArrayList))} should copy the data only
 *       once. This reduces the expense of habitually making defensive copies at API boundaries.

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: actual-behavior
    attributes:
      label: "What did you see happen?"

	flush(name string) error
	clearEntriesWithComment(name string, comment string) error
	clearEntriesWithIP(name string, ip netip.Addr) error
	listEntriesByIP(name string) ([]netip.Addr, error)
}

// TODO this should actually create v6 and v6 subsets of type `hash:ip`, add them both to a
// superset of type `list:set` - we can then query the superset directly in iptables (with the same rule),

              public Integer apply(String from) {
                return Integer.valueOf(from);
              }
            });

    List<Integer> actual = newArrayList(result);
    List<Integer> expected = asList(1, 2, 3);
    assertEquals(expected, actual);
    assertCanIterateAgain(result);
    assertEquals("[1, 2, 3]", result.toString());
  }

  public void testPoorlyBehavedTransform() {