// but we can check that it's not zero.
        long writtenTime = SMBUtil.readInt4(dst, 2) & 0xFFFFFFFFL;
        // This is a weak check, but better than nothing.
        // A more robust test would require a real SMB1SigningDigest.
        assertTrue(writtenTime != 0 || lastWriteTime == 0);
    }

    /**

# exec".
# Important: "tfrun foo | bar" is "( tfrun foo ) | bar", not "tfrun (foo | bar)".
# Therefore, "tfrun" commands cannot include pipes -- which is
# probably for the better. If a pipe is necessary for something, it is probably
# complex. Write a well-documented script under utilities/ to encapsulate the
# functionality instead.
tfrun() { "$@"; }

if [[ $(uname -s) = MSYS_NT* ]]; then

        .putShort((short) 0x0000)
        .putShort((short) 0x0000);
    assertEquals(hashCode, hasher.hash().asLong());
  }

  public void testHashFloatIsStable() {
    // Just a spot check.  Better than nothing.
    Hasher hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();
    hasher.putFloat(0x01000101f).putFloat(0f);
    assertEquals(0x49f9d18ee8ae1b28L, hasher.hash().asLong());

    hasher = HASH_FN.newHasher();

   * This implementation requires O(|N|) time. Classes extending this one may manually keep track of
   * the number of edges as the graph is updated, and override this method for better performance.
   */
  protected long edgeCount() {
    long degreeSum = 0L;
    for (N node : nodes()) {
      degreeSum += degree(node);
    }

  }

  /**
   * Returns a new builder with a hint for how many distinct keys are expected to be added. The
   * generated builder is equivalent to that returned by {@link #builder}, but may perform better if
   * {@code expectedKeys} is a good estimate.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedKeys} is negative
   * @since 33.3.0
   */

    assertEquals(c, navigableSet.higher(b));
    assertEquals(null, navigableSet.higher(c));
  }

  /*
   * TODO(cpovirk): make "too small" and "too large" elements available for better navigation
   * testing. At that point, we may be able to eliminate the "hole" tests, which would mean that
   * ContiguousSet's tests would no longer need to suppress them.
   */
  @CollectionSize.Require(SEVERAL)

   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if the resource is not found
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue // being used to check if a resource exists
  // TODO(cgdecker): maybe add a better way to check if a resource exists
  // e.g. Optional<URL> tryGetResource or boolean resourceExists
  public static URL getResource(String resourceName) {
    ClassLoader loader =
        MoreObjects.firstNonNull(

    /**
     * Clear all pending operations
     */
    public void clearPendingOperations() {
        pendingOperations.clear();
    }

    /**
     * Calculate channel score for load balancing (higher is better)
     *
     * @return channel score
     */
    public int getScore() {
        int score = 100;

        // Adjust based on state
        if (state == ChannelState.ACTIVE)

Pero en este caso, la misma aplicación de **FastAPI** manejará la API y la autenticación.

Así que, revisémoslo desde ese punto de vista simplificado:

* El usuario escribe el `username` y `password` en el frontend, y presiona `Enter`.
* El frontend (ejecutándose en el navegador del usuario) envía ese `username` y `password` a una URL específica en nuestra API (declarada con `tokenUrl="token"`).

    // GWT's ConcurrentHashMap is a wrapper around HashMap, but it rejects null keys, which matches
    // the behaviour of the non-GWT implementation of newConcurrentHashSet().
    // On the other hand HashSet might be better for code size if apps aren't
    // already using Collections.newSetFromMap and ConcurrentHashMap.
    return Collections.newSetFromMap(new ConcurrentHashMap<E, Boolean>());
  }