*/
package org.codelibs.core.text;

import java.util.Locale;

import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * @author higa
 *
 */
public class DecimalFormatUtilTest extends TestCase {

    /**
     * @throws Exception
     */
    public void testNormalize() throws Exception {
        assertEquals("1", "1000.00", DecimalFormatUtil.normalize("1,000.00", Locale.JAPAN));

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Covers basic sanity checks for the entire package.
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 */

@NullUnmarked
public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {
  public PackageSanityTests() {
    publicApiOnly(); // Many package-private classes are tested through the public API.
    setDefault(DiscreteDomain.class, DiscreteDomain.integers());
  }

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.collect.TableCollectionTest.ColumnTests;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class TreeBasedTableColumnTest extends ColumnTests {
  public TreeBasedTableColumnTest() {
    super(false, true, true, true, false);
  }

  @Override
  Table<String, Character, Integer> makeTable() {
    return TreeBasedTable.create();
  }

import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/** Basic sanity tests for classes in {@code common.base}. */

@GwtIncompatible
@NullUnmarked
public class PackageSanityTests extends AbstractPackageSanityTests {
  public PackageSanityTests() {
    // package private classes like FunctionalEquivalence are tested through the public API.
    publicApiOnly();
  }

 * Immutable}.
 */
// TODO(cpovirk): Should we just use ChecksumType directly instead of defining this type?
@Immutable

import com.google.common.annotations.GwtCompatible;
import com.google.common.collect.TableCollectionTest.ColumnTests;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class HashBasedTableColumnTest extends ColumnTests {
  public HashBasedTableColumnTest() {
    super(false, true, true, true, false);
  }

  @Override
  Table<String, Character, Integer> makeTable() {
    return HashBasedTable.create();
  }

import com.google.common.collect.TableCollectionTest.ColumnMapTests;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullMarked;

@GwtCompatible
@NullMarked
public class TreeBasedTableColumnMapTest extends ColumnMapTests {
  public TreeBasedTableColumnMapTest() {
    super(false, true, true, false);
  }

  @Override
  Table<Integer, String, Character> makeTable() {
    return TreeBasedTable.create();
  }

import static com.google.common.truth.Truth.assertThat;

import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

@NullUnmarked
public class CharEscaperBuilderTest extends TestCase {

  public void testAddEscapes() {
    char[] cs = {'a', 'b', 'c'};
    CharEscaperBuilder builder = new CharEscaperBuilder().addEscapes(cs, "Z");
    Escaper escaper = builder.toEscaper();

 * specific language governing permissions and limitations
 * under the License.
 */
package org.apache.maven.api.services;

import org.apache.maven.api.Language;

 * Tests the abstract transformer implementation and its name management functionality.
 */
public class AbstractTransformerTest extends PlainTestCase {

    /**
     * Concrete implementation of AbstractTransformer for testing
     */
    public static class TestTransformer extends AbstractTransformer {
        private int transformCallCount = 0;
        private ResponseData lastResponseData = null;