* calling code written in Kotlin).) Typically, we want to let a {@link Throwable} from such a
   * method propagate untouched, just as we'd typically let it do for a non-reflective call.
   * However, we can't usually write {@code throw t;} when {@code t} has a static type of {@link
   * Throwable}. But we <i>can</i> write {@code sneakyThrow(t);}.
   *

estivessem
estiver
estivermos
estiverem
hei
há
havemos
hão
houve
houvemos
houveram
houvera
houvéramos
haja
hajamos
hajam
houvesse
houvéssemos
houvessem
houver
houvermos
houverem
houverei
houverá
houveremos
houverão
houveria
houveríamos
houveriam
sou
somos
são
era
éramos
eram
fui
foi
fomos
foram
fora

   * identical inputs: This sounds like it ought to be a problem here, since the goals of this class
   * include testing that {@code equals()} is reflexive and is tolerant of {@code null}. However,
   * there's no problem. The reason: {@link EqualsTester} tests {@code null} and identical inputs
   * directly against {@code equals()} rather than through the {@code Equivalence}.
   */

 * {@code asMap} has a few subtleties. As long as the set of keys remains unchanged, adding or
 * removing mappings does not affect the key iteration order. However, if you remove all values
 * associated with a key and then add the key back to the multimap, that key will come last in the
 * key iteration order.
 *

 *   <li>hasNext()
 *   <li>hasNext();
 *   <li>remove();
 *   <li>next();
 * </ol>
 *
 * <p>This particular order of operations may be unrealistic, and testing all 3^5 of them may be
 * thought of as overkill; however, it's difficult to determine which proper subset of this massive
 * set would be sufficient to expose any possible bug. Brute force is simpler.
 *
 * <p>To use this class the concrete subclass must implement the {@link

        $submitButton[0].submit();
      }
      // ignore enter key down
      return false;
    }
  });

  $(".table tr[data-href]").each(function() {
    $(this)
      .css("cursor", "pointer")
      .hover(
        function() {
          $(this).addClass("active");
        },
        function() {
          $(this).removeClass("active");
        }
      )
      .click(function() {

 * }
 * }
 *
 * @author Ben Yu
 * @since 12.0
 */
/*
 * A nullable bound would let users create a TypeParameter instance for a parameter with a nullable
 * bound. However, it would also let them create `new TypeParameter<@Nullable T>() {}`, which
 * wouldn't behave as users might expect. Additionally, it's not clear how the TypeToken API could

 * method equivalent to {@link
 * java.util.concurrent.locks.ReentrantLock#hasWaiters(java.util.concurrent.locks.Condition)},
 * except that the method parameter must accept whatever condition-like object is passed into {@code
 * callAndAssertWaits} by the test.
 *
 * @param <L> the type of the lock-like object to be used
 * @author Justin T. Sampson
 */
@NullUnmarked

   */
  public PatternFilenameFilter(Pattern pattern) {
    this.pattern = Preconditions.checkNotNull(pattern);
  }

  /*
   * Our implementation works fine with a null `dir`. However, there's nothing in the documentation
   * of the supertype that suggests that implementations are expected to tolerate null. That said, I
   * see calls in Google code that pass a null `dir` to a FilenameFilter.... So let's declare the

/** See newDirectExecutorService javadoc for behavioral notes. */
@J2ktIncompatible // Emulated
@GwtIncompatible
final class DirectExecutorService extends AbstractListeningExecutorService {

  /** Lock used whenever accessing the state variables (runningTasks, shutdown) of the executor */
  private final Object lock = new Object();

  /*
   * Conceptually, these two variables describe the executor being in
   * one of three states: