<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

 *  @author Victor Jonsson, http://victorjonsson.se
 *  @license MIT
 */

 *  @author Victor Jonsson, http://victorjonsson.se
 *  @license MIT
 */

 *  @author Victor Jonsson, http://victorjonsson.se
 *  @license MIT
 */

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

<module>
<source path="">
  <!-- Hack to keep collect from hiding collect.testing supersource: -->
  <exclude name="**/testing/**"/>
</source>

<!--
    We used to set this only for packages that had manual supersource. That
    worked everywhere that I know of except for one place: when running the GWT
    util.concurrent tests under Guava.

    The problem is that GWT responds poorly to two .gwt.xml files in the same
    Java package; see

Et nous analysons directement ce contenu YAML, puis nous utilisons à nouveau le même modèle Pydantic pour valider le contenu YAML :

{* ../../docs_src/path_operation_advanced_configuration/tutorial007.py hl[26:33] *}

/// tip | Astuce

Ici, nous réutilisons le même modèle Pydantic.

Mais nous aurions pu tout aussi bien pu le valider d'une autre manière.

 *  @author Victor Jonsson, http://victorjonsson.se
 *  @license MIT
 */

      description: |
        Requesting we remove a module here only hides the generated documentation on pkg.go.dev.
        It does not affect the behaviour of proxy.golang.org or the go command.
        Instead we recommend using the retract directive which will be processed by all 3 of the above.

        If you have deleted your repo, please recreate it and publish a retraction.