b = bits.Sub64(t1[1], p256P[1], b) t2[2], b = bits.Sub64(t1[2], p256P[2], b) t2[3], b = bits.Sub64(t1[3], p256P[3], b) // Three options: // - a+b < p // then c is 0, b is 1, and t1 is correct // - p <= a+b < 2^256 // then c is 0, b is 0, and t2 is correct // - 2^256 <= a+b // then c is 1, b is 1, and t2 is correct t2Mask := (c ^ b) - 1 res[0] = (t1[0] & ^t2Mask) | (t2[0] & t2Mask) res[1] = (t1[1] & ^t2Mask) | (t2[1] & t2Mask) res[2] = (t1[2] & ^t2Mask) | (t2[2] & t2Mask) res[3] = (t1[3] & ^t2Mask)...

- Fix uint64 overflow when elapsed ([#94038](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/94038), [@andyzhangx](https://github.com/andyzhangx)) [SIG Node and Windows]
- Fix: incorrect max azure disk max count ([#92331](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/92331), [@andyzhangx](https://github.com/andyzhangx)) [SIG Cloud Provider and Storage]

constraints.LuhnCheck.message = La suma de comprobación Luhn Módulo 11 de {value} es incorrecta.
constraints.Mod10Check.message = La suma de comprobación Módulo 10 de {value} es incorrecta.
constraints.Mod11Check.message = La suma de comprobación Módulo 11 de {value} es incorrecta.
constraints.ModCheck.message = La suma de comprobación {modType} de {value} es incorrecta.
constraints.NotBlank.message = {item} no puede estar en blanco.

#### El tiempo de respuesta ayuda a los atacantes { #the-time-to-answer-helps-the-attackers }

En ese punto, al notar que el servidor tardó algunos microsegundos más en enviar el response "Nombre de usuario o contraseña incorrectos", los atacantes sabrán que acertaron en _algo_, algunas de las letras iniciales eran correctas.

Un exemple difficile de littéraux de chaîne dans des extraits de code : `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Info

... Cependant, les guillemets à l’intérieur des extraits de code doivent rester tels quels.

////

Un ejemplo difícil de literales de string en fragmentos de código: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Info

... Sin embargo, las comillas dentro de fragmentos de código deben quedarse tal cual.

////

////

## Quotes { #quotes }

//// tab | Test

Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'".

/// note

The LLM will probably translate this wrong. Interesting is only if it keeps the fixed translation when retranslating.

///

////

`scripts/translate.py`의 일반 프롬프트에서 `### Content of code snippets` 섹션을 참고하세요.

////

## 따옴표 { #quotes }

//// tab | 테스트

어제 제 친구가 이렇게 썼습니다: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". 이에 저는 이렇게 답했습니다: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'".

/// note | 참고

LLM은 아마 이것을 잘못 번역할 것입니다. 흥미로운 점은 재번역할 때 고정된 번역을 유지하는지 여부뿐입니다.

///

////

//// tab | 정보

Сложный пример строковых литералов во фрагментах кода: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Хардкор: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Информация

... Однако кавычки внутри фрагментов кода должны оставаться как есть.

////

Ein schwieriges Beispiel für Stringliterale in Codeschnipseln: `f"I like {'oranges' if orange else "apples"}"`

Hardcore: `Yesterday, my friend wrote: "If you spell incorrectly correctly, you have spelled it incorrectly". To which I answered: "Correct, but 'incorrectly' is incorrectly not '"incorrectly"'"`

////

//// tab | Info

... Allerdings müssen Anführungszeichen in Codeschnipseln unverändert bleiben.

////