## Public Discussions

Please restrain from publicly discussing a potential security vulnerability. 🙊

It's better to discuss privately and try to find a solution first, to limit the potential impact as much as possible.

---

Thanks for your help!

@SuppressWarnings("JUnit4ClassUsedInJUnit3")
public class ListIndexOfTester<E> extends AbstractListIndexOfTester<E> {
  @Override
  protected int find(Object o) {
    return getList().indexOf(o);
  }

  @Override
  protected String getMethodName() {
    return "indexOf";
  }

  @CollectionFeature.Require(absent = REJECTS_DUPLICATES_AT_CREATION)

          writeHttpResponse(socket, response)
          reuseSocket = false
        } else {
          writeHttpResponse(socket, response)
        }

        if (logger.isLoggable(Level.FINE)) {
          logger.fine(
            "${this@MockWebServer} received request: $request and responded: $response",
          )
        }

        // See warnings associated with these socket policies in SocketPolicy.

          List<? extends E> list,
          int foundIndex) {
        // Of course, we have to use binary search to find the precise
        // breakpoint...
        int lower = 0;
        int upper = foundIndex;
        // Of course, we have to use binary search to find the precise breakpoint...
        // Everything between lower and upper inclusive compares at <= 0.
        while (lower < upper) {

{\n      this.minimize()\n      return\n    }\n\n    this.maximize()\n  }\n\n  // Private\n\n  _init(card) {\n    this._parent = card\n\n    $(this).find(this._settings.collapseTrigger).click(() => {\n      this.toggle()\n    })\n\n    $(this).find(this._settings.maximizeTrigger).click(() => {\n      this.toggleMaximize()\n    })\n\n    $(this).find(this._settings.removeTrigger).click(() => {\n      this.remove()\n    })\n  }\n\n  // Static\n\n  static _jQueryInterface(config) {\n    let data = ...

	var r T
	err := g.g.apply(ctx).Model(r).Find(result).Error
	return err
}

func (g execG[T]) Last(ctx context.Context) (T, error) {
	var r T
	err := g.g.apply(ctx).Last(&r).Error
	return r, err
}

func (g execG[T]) Take(ctx context.Context) (T, error) {
	var r T
	err := g.g.apply(ctx).Take(&r).Error
	return r, err
}

func (g execG[T]) Find(ctx context.Context) ([]T, error) {
	var r []T

    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.

@Tag("Slow")
class AllMainsTest {
  @ParameterizedTest
  @ArgumentsSource(MainTestProvider::class)
  fun runMain(className: String) {
    val mainMethod =
      Class
        .forName(className)
        .methods
        .find { it.name == "main" }
    try {
      if (mainMethod != null) {
        if (mainMethod.parameters.isEmpty()) {
          mainMethod.invoke(null)
        } else {
          mainMethod.invoke(null, arrayOf<String>())

function prepare_block_devices() {
	set -e
	mkdir -p ${WORK_DIR}/disks/ ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/
	sudo modprobe loop
	for i in 1 2 3 4; do
		dd if=/dev/zero of=${WORK_DIR}/disks/img.${i} bs=1M count=2000
		device=$(sudo losetup --find --show ${WORK_DIR}/disks/img.${i})
		sudo mkfs.ext4 -F ${device}
		mkdir -p ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/disk${i}/
		sudo mount ${device} ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/disk${i}/
		sudo chown "$(id -u):$(id -g)" ${device} ${WORK_DIR}/mnt/disk${i}/
	done

    writing it has test supersource but no prod supersource.

    GWT happens to use the prod .gwt.xml, so it looks for no supersource for
    tests, either. This causes it to fail to find AtomicLongMapTest.

    Our workaround is to tell GWT that util.concurrent and all other packages
    have prod supersource, even if they have none. GWT is happy to ignore us
    when we specify a nonexistent path.