/**
 * Unit tests for {@link SmbResourceLocator}. Since the interface has no
 * concrete implementation in this repository, a lightweight implementation
 * is provided solely for the purpose of exercising the contract.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
public class SmbResourceLocatorTest {

    /**
     * A very small concrete implementation used only by the tests. It parses

import org.junit.jupiter.api.extension.ExtendWith;
import org.mockito.Mock;
import org.mockito.junit.jupiter.MockitoExtension;

/**
 * Comprehensive test suite for jcifs.SmbResource interface.
 * Tests SMB resource interface contract and functionality for CIFS/SMB protocol compliance.
 */
@ExtendWith(MockitoExtension.class)
@DisplayName("SmbResource Interface Tests")
class SmbResourceTest {

    @Mock
    private SmbResource mockResource;

/**
 * Comprehensive test class for ACE interface constants and behavior.
 * Tests all constants, bitwise operations, and interface methods.
 * Achieves 100% coverage of the ACE interface contract.
 */
@DisplayName("ACE Interface Comprehensive Tests")
class ACETest {

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("File Access Constants Tests")
    class FileAccessConstantsTests {

        @Test

      // assumes that each set is a singleton or less (as is done for the samples)
      for (Object elem : elements) {
        @SuppressWarnings("unchecked") // safe by generator contract
        Entry<String, Collection<Integer>> entry = (Entry<String, Collection<Integer>>) elem;
        Integer value = getOnlyElement(entry.getValue());
        builder.put(entry.getKey(), value);
      }

    // They aren't equal...
    assertFalse(hashCodeA.equals(hashCodeB));

    // But they still have the same Object#hashCode() value.
    // Technically not a violation of the equals/hashCode contract, but...?
    assertEquals(hashCodeA.hashCode(), hashCodeB.hashCode());
  }

  public void testRoundTripHashCodeUsingFromString() {
    HashCode hash1 = Hashing.sha1().hashString("foo", US_ASCII);

@GwtIncompatible
@J2ObjCIncompatible
abstract class TempFileCreator {
  static final TempFileCreator INSTANCE = pickSecureCreator();

  /**
   * @throws IllegalStateException if the directory could not be created (to implement the contract
   *     of {@link Files#createTempDir()}, such as if the system does not support creating temporary
   *     directories securely
   */
  abstract File createTempDir();

        // Test commit (should not throw exception)
        callback.commit();
    }

    public void test_multiple_implementations() {
        // Test with different implementations to ensure interface contract
        IndexUpdateCallback callback1 = createMockCallback(10, 500);
        IndexUpdateCallback callback2 = createMockCallback(20, 1000);

        assertEquals(10L, callback1.getDocumentSize());

            //
            // ---
            //
            // If the CAS fails, the provided callable already started running (or it is about
            // to). Our contract promises:
            //
            // 1. not to execute a new callable until the old one has returned
            //
            // If we were to cancel taskFuture, that would let the next task start while the old

 * elements, if there is no comparator) to test element equality. As a result, if the comparator is
 * not consistent with equals, some of the standard implementations may violate the {@code Set}
 * contract.
 *
 * <p>The {@code standard} methods and the collection views they return are not guaranteed to be
 * thread-safe, even when all of the methods that they depend on are thread-safe.
 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman

    // They aren't equal...
    assertFalse(hashCodeA.equals(hashCodeB));

    // But they still have the same Object#hashCode() value.
    // Technically not a violation of the equals/hashCode contract, but...?
    assertEquals(hashCodeA.hashCode(), hashCodeB.hashCode());
  }

  public void testRoundTripHashCodeUsingFromString() {
    HashCode hash1 = Hashing.sha1().hashString("foo", US_ASCII);