// In that case we will drop the directory entry.
				// This should however not be confused with an object with a trailing slash.
				dirMatches := best.isDir() == other.isDir()
				suffixMatches := strings.HasSuffix(best.name, slashSeparator) == strings.HasSuffix(other.name, slashSeparator)

				// Simple case. Both are same type with same suffix.
				if dirMatches && suffixMatches {

 * LinkedHashMultimap}. The GWT supersource for this class contains a field for each type.
 *
 * <p>For details about this hack, see {@code GwtSerializationDependencies}, which takes the same
 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

 * supersource for this class contains a field of type {@code C}.
 *
 * <p>For details about this hack, see {@code GwtSerializationDependencies}, which takes the same
 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 */
@SuppressWarnings("rawtypes") // https://github.com/google/guava/issues/989

# If you're looking at this file in a different repo and want to make a change, please go to the
# common-files repo, make the change there and check it in. Then come back to this repo and run
# "make update-common".

rules:
  braces: disable
  brackets: disable
  colons: enable
  commas: disable
  comments: disable
  comments-indentation: disable
  document-end: disable

                    },
                }
            },
            "/response_model-no_annotation-return_same_model": {
                "get": {
                    "summary": "Response Model No Annotation Return Same Model",
                    "operationId": "response_model_no_annotation_return_same_model_response_model_no_annotation_return_same_model_get",
                    "responses": {
                        "200": {

   */
  boolean hasEdgeConnecting(EndpointPair<N> endpoints);

  //
  // Network identity
  //

  /**
   * Returns {@code true} iff {@code object} is a {@link Network} that has the same elements and the
   * same structural relationships as those in this network.
   *
   * <p>Thus, two networks A and B are equal if <b>all</b> of the following are true:
   *
   * <ul>

		&Account{Number: "account-slice-append-2"},
		&Account{Number: "account-slice-append-3"},
	)

	AssertAssociationCount(t, users, "Account", 3, "After Append")

	// Replace -> same as append

	// Delete
	if err := DB.Model(&users).Association("Account").Delete(&users[0].Account); err != nil {
		t.Errorf("no error should happened when deleting account, but got %v", err)
	}

 * The GWT supersource for this class contains a field for each type.
 *
 * <p>For details about this hack, see {@code GwtSerializationDependencies}, which takes the same
 * approach but with a subclass rather than a superclass.
 *
 * <p>TODO(cpovirk): Consider applying this subclass approach to our other types.
 */
@GwtCompatible(emulated = true)

app.flags = flags

# These symbols appear because we import the python package which
# in turn imports from tensorflow.core and tensorflow.python. They
# must come from this module. So python adds these symbols for the
# resolution to succeed.
# pylint: disable=undefined-variable
del python
del core

    attributes:
      label: Context
      description: |
        How has this issue affected you? What are you trying to accomplish? What other alternatives have you considered?
        Providing context helps us come up with a solution that is most useful in the real world
    validations: