El resultado es que, en nuestra app, cada una de las *path operations* del módulo `admin` tendrá:

* El prefix `/admin`.
* El tag `admin`.
* La dependencia `get_token_header`.
* La response `418`. 🍵

Pero eso solo afectará a ese `APIRouter` en nuestra app, no en ningún otro código que lo utilice.

Así, por ejemplo, otros proyectos podrían usar el mismo `APIRouter` con un método de autenticación diferente.

```Python hl_lines="2"
@app.get('/')
def results():
    results = some_library()
    return results
```

---

Se sua aplicação (de alguma forma) não tem que se comunicar com nada mais e esperar que o respondam, use `async def`, mesmo que você não precise usar `await` dentro dela.

---

Se você simplesmente não sabe, use apenas `def`.

---

import org.codelibs.fess.unit.UnitFessTestCase;
import org.codelibs.fess.util.ComponentUtil;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.Test;
import org.junit.jupiter.api.TestInfo;
import org.lastaflute.web.response.render.RenderData;
import org.lastaflute.web.validation.VaMessenger;

public class AdminSearchlistActionTest extends UnitFessTestCase {

    @Override
    protected void setUp(TestInfo testInfo) throws Exception {

		for _, drive := range drives {
			if drive.State == madmin.DriveStateOk {
				count++
			}
		}
		return count
	}

	// task queued, now wait for the response.
	select {
	case res := <-task.respCh:
		if res.err == nil {
			h.countHealed(healType)
		} else {
			h.countFailed(healType)
		}
		if !h.reportProgress {

		t.Errorf("Expected: \"Drive not found\", got \"%s\"", err)
	}
}

// TestXLStorageDeleteFile - Series of test cases construct valid and invalid input data and validates the result and the error response.
func TestXLStorageDeleteFile(t *testing.T) {
	if runtime.GOOS == globalWindowsOSName {
		t.Skip()
	}

	// create xlStorage test setup
	xlStorage, path, err := newXLStorageTestSetup(t)
	if err != nil {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should handle zero sam pointer correctly")
        void testDecodeOutZeroSamPointer() throws NdrException {
            // Given: Message with non-null sam and zero pointer in response
            samr.SamrSamArray samArray = spy(new samr.SamrSamArray());
            samr.SamrEnumerateAliasesInDomain message = new samr.SamrEnumerateAliasesInDomain(mockPolicyHandle, 1, 2, samArray, 3);

</details>

### Check it { #check-it }

Open your browser at [http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/5?q=somequery](http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/5?q=somequery).

You will see the JSON response as:

```JSON
{"item_id": 5, "q": "somequery"}
```

You already created an API that:

* Receives HTTP requests in the _paths_ `/` and `/items/{item_id}`.

</details>

### Check it

Open your browser at [http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/5?q=somequery](http://127.0.0.1:8000/items/5?q=somequery).

You will see the JSON response as:

```JSON
{"item_id": 5, "q": "somequery"}
```

You already created an API that:

* Receives HTTP requests in the _paths_ `/` and `/items/{item_id}`.

  /*
   * RE: the WaitNotInLoop warnings:
   *
   * Our tests for awaitUninterruptibly are written under the assumption that no spurious wakeups
   * occur except for those produced by awaitUninterruptibly itself in response to interrupts.
   *
   * This isn't guaranteed to work, so any further spurious wakeups would probably cause failures in
   * tests that assert that a certain amount of time has passed, that the method returned `false`,

	// 	return "", fmt.Errorf("Error reading body: %v", err)
	// }
	// fmt.Printf("resp body: %s\n", string(bodyBuf))
	// fmt.Printf("lastReq: %#v\n", lastReq.URL.String())

	// On form submission, the last redirect response contains the auth
	// code, which we now have in `lastReq`. Exchange it for a JWT id_token.
	q := lastReq.URL.Query()
	// fmt.Printf("lastReq.URL: %#v q: %#v\n", lastReq.URL, q)
	code := q.Get("code")