user.Manager = &User{Name: "manager-belongs-to-association"}
	if err := DB.Save(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when update: %v", err)
	}

	var user2 User
	DB.Preload("Company").Preload("Manager").Find(&user2, "id = ?", user.ID)
	CheckUser(t, user2, user)

	user.Company.Name += "new"
	user.Manager.Name += "new"
	if err := DB.Save(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when update: %v", err)
	}

        assertTrue(region.hasAccess(RdmaAccess.LOCAL_READ), "Should have local read access");
        assertTrue(region.hasAccess(RdmaAccess.LOCAL_WRITE), "Should have local write access");
        assertFalse(region.hasAccess(RdmaAccess.REMOTE_READ), "Should not have remote read access");

        // Test cleanup
        region.close();

import java.lang.reflect.Method;
import java.util.Locale;
import junit.framework.TestCase;

/**
 * Since annotations have some reusability issues that force copy and paste all over the place, it's
 * worth having a test to ensure that all our Feature enums have their annotations correctly set up.
 *
 * @author George van den Driessche
 */
public class FeatureEnumTest extends TestCase {

        assertEquals(32, derived1.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived2.length, "Derived key should have correct length");
        assertEquals(32, derived3.length, "Derived key should have correct length");

        assertFalse(Arrays.equals(derived1, derived2), "Different labels should produce different keys");

import org.apache.maven.artifact.resolver.ArtifactResolutionException;

/**
 */
@Deprecated
public interface ArtifactTransformation {
    String ROLE = ArtifactTransformation.class.getName();

    /**
     * Take in an artifact and return the transformed artifact for locating in the remote repository. If no
     * transformation has occurred the original artifact is returned.
     *
     * @param artifact           Artifact to be transformed.

        assertNotNull("Parameter annotations should exist", paramAnnotations);
        assertEquals("Should have one parameter", 1, paramAnnotations.length);
        assertEquals("Parameter should have one annotation", 1, paramAnnotations[0].length);

        final UriType annotation = (UriType) paramAnnotations[0][0];

	}

	user.Pets = []*Pet{{Name: "pet1"}, {Name: "pet2"}}
	if err := DB.Save(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when update: %v", err)
	}

	var user2 User
	DB.Preload("Pets").Find(&user2, "id = ?", user.ID)
	CheckUser(t, user2, user)

	for _, pet := range user.Pets {
		pet.Name += "new"
	}

	if err := DB.Save(&user).Error; err != nil {
		t.Fatalf("errors happened when update: %v", err)
	}

  /*
   * Ideally, this class would have exposed only constructors that require a non-null cause. See
   * https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify-reference-checker/blob/61aafa4ae52594830cfc2d61c8b113009dbdb045/src/main/java/com/google/jspecify/nullness/NullSpecTransfer.java#L789
   * and https://github.com/jspecify/jspecify/issues/490.
   *
   * (Perhaps it should also have required that its cause was a RuntimeException. However, that

That's why the current versions are still `0.x.x`, this reflects that each version could potentially have breaking changes. This follows the <a href="https://semver.org/" class="external-link" target="_blank">Semantic Versioning</a> conventions.

You can create production applications with **FastAPI** right now (and you have probably been doing it for some time), you just have to make sure that you use a version that works correctly with the rest of your code.

{% endif %}

{% endfor %}

</div>

## Top Contributors

Here are the **Top Contributors**. 👷

These users have [created the most Pull Requests](help-fastapi.md#create-a-pull-request){.internal-link target=_blank} that have been *merged*.

They have contributed source code, documentation, etc. 📦

<div class="user-list user-list-center">

{% for user in (contributors.values() | list)[:50] %}