* Anche la documentazione alternativa dell'API mostrerà il nuovo parametro della query e il _body_:

![ReDoc](https://fastapi.tiangolo.com/img/index/index-06-redoc-02.png)

### Riepilogo

Ricapitolando, è sufficiente dichiarare **una sola volta** i tipi dei parametri, del body, ecc. come parametri di funzioni.

Questo con le annotazioni per i tipi standard di Python.

```java
public class RdmaSecurityManager {
    public void validateMemoryAccess(RdmaMemoryRegion region, RdmaAccess requestedAccess) {
        if (!region.hasAccess(requestedAccess)) {
            throw new SecurityException("Insufficient RDMA memory access rights");
        }
    }
    
    public void validateRemoteAccess(long remoteAddress, int length, int remoteKey) {
        // Validate that remote memory access is authorized

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }

   * if {@code n == 0}.
   *
   * <p><b>Warning:</b> the result takes <i>O(n log n)</i> space, so use cautiously.
   *
   * <p>This uses an efficient binary recursive algorithm to compute the factorial with balanced
   * multiplies. It also removes all the 2s from the intermediate products (shifting them back in at
   * the end).
   *

      }
    }
  }

  /** Returns the {@code Class} object of arrays with {@code componentType}. */
  static Class<?> getArrayClass(Class<?> componentType) {
    // TODO(user): This is not the most efficient way to handle generic
    // arrays, but is there another way to extract the array class in a
    // non-hacky way (i.e. using String value class names- "[L...")?
    return Array.newInstance(componentType, 0).getClass();

Aqui estão alguns exemplos de quando isso pode fazer sentido:

#### Um Aplicativo Simples

Você pode querer um gerenciador de processos no contêiner se seu aplicativo for **simples o suficiente** para que você não precise (pelo menos não agora) ajustar muito o número de processos, e você pode simplesmente usar um padrão automatizado (com a imagem oficial do Docker), e você está executando em um **único servidor**, não em um cluster.

   * Reader#skip(long) skip} to the end of the stream, and return the total number of chars that
   * were skipped.
   *
   * <p>Note that for sources that implement {@link #lengthIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of chars
   * than would be returned by reading all of the chars.
   *

   * Reader#skip(long) skip} to the end of the stream, and return the total number of chars that
   * were skipped.
   *
   * <p>Note that for sources that implement {@link #lengthIfKnown} to provide a more efficient
   * implementation, it is <i>possible</i> that this method will return a different number of chars
   * than would be returned by reading all of the chars.
   *

### Reproduce el problema

En la mayoría de los casos y preguntas hay algo relacionado con el **código original** de la persona.

En muchos casos solo copiarán un fragmento del código, pero eso no es suficiente para **reproducir el problema**.

    return file(new File(first), more);
  }

  /** Returns a {@code File} object for the given path parts. */
  private static File file(File first, String... more) {
    // not very efficient, but should definitely be correct
    File file = first;
    for (String name : more) {
      file = new File(file, name);
    }
    return file;
  }