#### Das Problem beheben mittels `secrets.compare_digest()` { #fix-it-with-secrets-compare-digest }

Aber in unserem Code verwenden wir tatsächlich `secrets.compare_digest()`.

         * large that doing the lookup is noticeably slower than redoing the work would be.
         *
         * Ideally we'd have a real eviction policy, but until we see a problem in practice, I hope
         * that this will suffice. I have not even benchmarked with different size limits.
         */
        if (validClasses.size() > 1000) {
          validClasses.clear();
        }

                // Don't want to have two workers pulling from the queue.
                return;
              } else {
                // Increment the run counter to avoid the ABA problem of a submitter marking the
                // thread as QUEUED after it already ran and exhausted the queue before returning
                // from execute().
                workerRunCount++;

                // Don't want to have two workers pulling from the queue.
                return;
              } else {
                // Increment the run counter to avoid the ABA problem of a submitter marking the
                // thread as QUEUED after it already ran and exhausted the queue before returning
                // from execute().
                workerRunCount++;

     * in any IO with the server. Unlink <code>InputStream</code> value less than
     * the one provided will not be returned if it exceeds the end of the file
     * (if this is a problem let us know).
     */
    @Override
    public long skip(final long n) throws IOException {
        if (n > 0) {
            fp += n;
            return n;
        }
        return 0;
    }

    assertEquals(Integer.MAX_VALUE, ms.tailMultiset("a", CLOSED).size());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  @AndroidIncompatible // Reflection bug, or actual binary compatibility problem?
  public void testElementSetBridgeMethods() {
    for (Method m : TreeMultiset.class.getMethods()) {
      if (m.getName().equals("elementSet") && m.getReturnType().equals(SortedSet.class)) {
        return;
      }

 * {@code .compare(a.foo, b.foo)} but you actually wrote {@code .compare(a.foo, a.foo)} or {@code
 * .compare(a.foo, b.bar)}. {@code ComparisonChain} also has a potential performance problem that
 * {@code Comparator} doesn't: it evaluates all the parameters of all the {@code .compare} calls,
 * even when the result of the comparison is already known from previous {@code .compare} calls.
 * That can be expensive.
 *

 *
 * Uses a subject that contains kerberos credentials for use in GSSAPI context establishment.
 *
 * Be advised that short/NetBIOS name usage is not supported with this authenticator. Always specify full FQDNs.
 * This can be a problem if using DFS in it's default configuration as they still return referrals in short form.
 * See <a href="https://support.microsoft.com/en-us/kb/244380">KB-244380</a> for compatible server configuration.

    assertEquals(Integer.MAX_VALUE, ms.tailMultiset("a", CLOSED).size());
  }

  @J2ktIncompatible
  @GwtIncompatible // reflection
  @AndroidIncompatible // Reflection bug, or actual binary compatibility problem?
  public void testElementSetBridgeMethods() {
    for (Method m : TreeMultiset.class.getMethods()) {
      if (m.getName().equals("elementSet") && m.getReturnType().equals(SortedSet.class)) {
        return;
      }

        if (type.isInstance(value)) {
            return true;
        }
        // likely Boolean -> boolean, Short -> int etc. conversions, it's not the problem case we try to avoid
        return ((type.isPrimitive() || type.getName().startsWith("java.lang."))
                && value.getClass().getName().startsWith("java.lang."));
    }