// * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter

	if newGlobalAuthZPluginFn() != nil {
		return claims, nil
	}

	// Check if a session policy is set. If so, decode it here.
	sp, spok := claims.Lookup(policy.SessionPolicyName)
	if spok {
		// Looks like subpolicy is set and is a string, if set then its
		// base64 encoded, decode it. Decoding fails reject such
		// requests.
		spBytes, err := base64.StdEncoding.DecodeString(sp)
		if err != nil {

///

If you go to your browser you will see that now the docs show your new section (the info box at the top is gone). 🎉

Now you can translate it all and see how it looks as you save the file.

#### Don't Translate these Pages

🚨 Don't translate:

* Files under `reference/`
* `release-notes.md`
* `fastapi-people.md`
* `external-links.md`
* `newsletter.md`

   * might not (and the answer might change while we're building the array).
   *
   * TODO: cpovirk - Is this an issue anywhere anymore? It looks to have been fixed for Java 8
   * (https://bugs.openjdk.org/browse/JDK-7121314) and before Lollipop
   * (https://r.android.com/47508). We *would* need to worry for J2KT, whose own concurrency support

			name:   "list keys as user set policy that allows listing but denies specific keys",
			method: http.MethodGet,
			path:   kmsKeyListPath,
			query:  map[string]string{"pattern": "*"},
			asRoot: false,

			// It looks like this should allow listing any key that isn't "default-test-key", however
			// the policy engine matches all Deny statements first, without regard to Resources (for KMS).

      annotatedTypeExists()
          ? NullnessAnnotationReader.FROM_DECLARATION_AND_TYPE_USE_ANNOTATIONS
          : NullnessAnnotationReader.FROM_DECLARATION_ANNOTATIONS_ONLY;

  /**
   * Looks for declaration nullness annotations and, if supported, type-use nullness annotations.
   *
   * <p>Under Android VMs, the methods for retrieving type-use annotations don't exist. This means

        }
      }
    }
  }

  /**
   * Checks that a Hasher returns the same HashCode when given the same input, and also that the
   * collision rate looks sane.
   */
  static void assertInvariants(HashFunction hashFunction) {
    int objects = 100;
    Set<HashCode> hashcodes = Sets.newHashSetWithExpectedSize(objects);
    Random random = new Random(314159);

  // * We are more responsive to completion than timeouts. This is because parkNanos depends on
  //   system scheduling and as such we could either miss our deadline, or unpark() could be delayed
  //   so that it looks like we timed out even though we didn't. For comparison FutureTask respects
  //   completion preferably and AQS is non-deterministic (depends on where in the queue the waiter

      annotatedTypeExists()
          ? NullnessAnnotationReader.FROM_DECLARATION_AND_TYPE_USE_ANNOTATIONS
          : NullnessAnnotationReader.FROM_DECLARATION_ANNOTATIONS_ONLY;

  /**
   * Looks for declaration nullness annotations and, if supported, type-use nullness annotations.
   *
   * <p>Under Android VMs, the methods for retrieving type-use annotations don't exist. This means

      if (initialized) {
        cleanupQueue.schedule(cleanupTask) // Trim the existing store if necessary.
      }
    }

  /*
   * This cache uses a journal file named "journal". A typical journal file looks like this:
   *
   *     libcore.io.DiskLruCache
   *     1
   *     100
   *     2
   *
   *     CLEAN 3400330d1dfc7f3f7f4b8d4d803dfcf6 832 21054
   *     DIRTY 335c4c6028171cfddfbaae1a9c313c52