<component name="invokerAssistant" class="org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.common.ImplementedInvokerAssistant"/>
	<component name="behaviorCommandInvoker" class="org.dbflute.bhv.core.BehaviorCommandInvoker"/>

	<!-- The components of Behavior. -->
	<component name="accessTokenBhv" class="org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exbhv.AccessTokenBhv"/>
	<component name="badWordBhv" class="org.codelibs.fess.opensearch.config.exbhv.BadWordBhv"/>

		apiErr := errorCodes.ToAPIErr(ErrInvalidCopyPartRangeSource)
		apiErr.Description = err.Error()
		writeErrorResponse(ctx, w, apiErr, url)
		return
	}
}

// Parses x-amz-copy-source-range for CopyObjectPart API. Its behavior
// is different from regular HTTP range header. It only supports the
// form `bytes=first-last` where first and last are zero-based byte
// offsets. See

 *
 * @author Louis Wasserman
 */
public class OutsideEventBusTest extends TestCase {

  /*
   * If you do this test from common.eventbus.EventBusTest, it doesn't actually test the behavior.
   * That is, even if exactly the same method works from inside the common.eventbus package tests,
   * it can fail here.
   */
  public void testAnonymous() {
    AtomicReference<String> holder = new AtomicReference<>();

 *    thread's [uncaught exception handler][Thread.UncaughtExceptionHandler]. By default this
 *    crashes the application on Android and prints a stacktrace on the JVM. (Crash reporting
 *    libraries may customize this behavior.)
 *
 * A good way to signal a failure is with a synthetic HTTP response:
 *
 * ```kotlin
 *   @Throws(IOException::class)
 *   override fun intercept(chain: Interceptor.Chain): Response {

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

     *
     * TODO(cpovirk): decide what the best long-term action here is: force users
     * to suppress (as we do now), stop testing entrySet().add() at all, make
     * entrySet().add() tests tolerant of either behavior, introduce a map
     * feature for entrySet() that supports add(), or something else
     */
    return asList(
        getAddUnsupportedNotPresentMethod(),
        getAddAllUnsupportedNonePresentMethod(),

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},

 *       String}.
 *   <li>{@code getElement} on a {@code Multiset.Entry<@Nullable String>} returns {@code @Nullable
 *       String}.
 * </ul>
 *
 * This is the same behavior as type-variable usages have to Kotlin and to the Checker Framework.
 * Contrast the method above to:
 *
 * <ul>
 *   <li>methods whose return type is a type variable but which can never return {@code null},