<jsp:include page="/WEB-INF/view/common/admin/sidebar.jsp">
        <jsp:param name="menuCategoryType" value="system"/>
        <jsp:param name="menuType" value="design"/>
    </jsp:include>
    <main class="content-wrapper">
        <div class="content-header">
            <div class="container-fluid">
                <div class="row mb-2">
                    <div class="col-sm-6">

`ModelServer` collates all computation graphs exposed to it (from multiple
`SavedModel`) and executes them in parallel on available executors. Running
TensorFlow in a multitenant design mixes the risks described above with the
inherent ones from multitenant configurations. The primary areas of concern are
tenant isolation, resource allocation, model sharing and hardware attacks.

### Tenant isolation

	var (
		assigns  []clause.Assignment
		assocOps []clause.Association
	)

	for _, item := range items {
		// Check if it's an AssociationAssigner
		if assocAssigner, ok := item.(clause.AssociationAssigner); ok {
			assocOps = append(assocOps, assocAssigner.AssociationAssignments()...)
		} else {
			assigns = append(assigns, item.Assignments()...)
		}
	}

If you need or want to work with **GraphQL**, <a href="https://strawberry.rocks/" class="external-link" target="_blank">**Strawberry**</a> is the **recommended** library as it has the design closest to **FastAPI's** design, it's all based on **type annotations**.

Depending on your use case, you might prefer to use a different library, but if you asked me, I would probably suggest you try **Strawberry**.

Se você precisar ou quiser trabalhar com **GraphQL**, <a href="https://strawberry.rocks/" class="external-link" target="_blank">**Strawberry**</a> é a biblioteca **recomendada** pois tem o design mais próximo ao design do **FastAPI**, ela é toda baseada em **anotações de tipo**.

    id: generics-proposal
    attributes:
      label: Is this about generics?
      description: If so, how does this relate to the accepted design and other generics proposals?
      placeholder: |
       Yes or No

       If yes, 
        1. how does this relate to the accepted design and other generics proposals?

    validations:
      required: true

  - type: textarea
    id: proposal
    attributes:

    }

    @Test
    @DisplayName("Test sign method with valid parameters")
    void testSignWithValidParameters() {
        // Arrange
        int offset = 0;
        int length = testData.length;

        // Act
        signingDigest.sign(testData, offset, length, request, response);

        // Assert
        verify(signingDigest, times(1)).sign(testData, offset, length, request, response);
    }

							<p><la:message key="labels.menu_scheduler_config" /></p>
						</a></li></c:if>
						
					<c:if test="${fe:permission('admin-design-view')}">
					<li class="nav-item">
						<a href="${fe:url('/admin/design/')}" class="nav-link <c:if test="${param.menuType=='design'}">active</c:if>" <c:if test="${param.menuType=='design'}">aria-current="page"</c:if>>
							<i class='fa fa-genderless nav-icon' aria-hidden="true"></i>

Whenever you need the client to pass information in the request and you don't know how to, you can search (Google) how to do it in `httpx`, or even how to do it with `requests`, as HTTPX's design is based on Requests' design.

Then you just do the same in your tests.

E.g.:

* To pass a *path* or *query* parameter, add it to the URL itself.

Wenn Sie mit **GraphQL** arbeiten möchten oder müssen, ist <a href="https://strawberry.rocks/" class="external-link" target="_blank">**Strawberry**</a> die **empfohlene** Bibliothek, da deren Design **FastAPIs** Design am nächsten kommt und alles auf **Typannotationen** basiert.