- The `baseline` and `restricted` pod security admission levels blocked setting the `host` field on probe and lifecycle handlers. ([#125271](https://github.com/kubernetes/kubernetes/pull/125271), [@tssurya](https://github.com/tssurya)) [SIG Auth, Node and Testing]

    Previously OkHttp used its connection pool as a lock when making changes to connections and
    calls. With this change each connection is locked independently.

 *  Upgrade: [Okio 2.7.0][okio_2_7_0].

    ```kotlin
    implementation("com.squareup.okio:okio:2.7.0")
    ```

		                          </Rule>
		                          </LifecycleConfiguration>`,
			expectedParsingErr:    nil,
			expectedValidationErr: nil,
		},
		{ // Using ExpiredObjectAllVersions element with an object locked bucket
			inputConfig: `<LifecycleConfiguration>
                                        <Rule>
                                          <ID>ExpiredObjectAllVersions with object locking</ID>
		                          <Filter>

	o.EvalRetentionBypassFn = f
}

// ObjectLayer implements primitives for object API layer.
type ObjectLayer interface {
	// Locking operations on object.
	NewNSLock(bucket string, objects ...string) RWLocker

	// Storage operations.
	Shutdown(context.Context) error
	NSScanner(ctx context.Context, updates chan<- DataUsageInfo, wantCycle uint32, scanMode madmin.HealScanMode) error
	BackendInfo() madmin.BackendInfo

	return &IAMObjectStore{
		iamCache:     newIamCache(),
		objAPI:       objAPI,
		usersSysType: usersSysType,
	}
}

func (iamOS *IAMObjectStore) rlock() *iamCache {
	iamOS.RLock()
	return iamOS.iamCache
}

func (iamOS *IAMObjectStore) runlock() {
	iamOS.RUnlock()
}

func (iamOS *IAMObjectStore) lock() *iamCache {
	iamOS.Lock()
	return iamOS.iamCache
}

             */
            if (this.state != 5 && this.state != 6) {
                doConnect();
            }
        } catch (final Exception ex) {
            ex0 = ex; // Defer to below where we're locked
            return;
        } finally {
            synchronized (run_thread) {
                if (run_thread != this.thread) {
                    /*

            //                cb.fetchFirst(0);
            //                createSearchLogCondition(pager, cb);
            //                // TODO 0 clicked
            //                });
        } else {
            list = (EsPagingResultBean<?>) searchLogBhv.selectPage(cb -> {
                cb.paging(pager.getPageSize(), pager.getCurrentPageNumber());

        }
    }

    @Nested
    @DisplayName("Mock Behavior Verification Tests")
    class MockBehaviorTests {

        @Test
        @DisplayName("Should verify all interface methods can be mocked")
        void testAllMethodsCanBeMocked() {
            // Setup all mock behaviors
            when(mockReferralData.getExpiration()).thenReturn(1000L);
            when(mockReferralData.getPathConsumed()).thenReturn(10);

			writeErrorResponseJSON(ctx, w, errorCodes.ToAPIErrWithErr(ErrAdminNoSuchUser, err), r.URL)
			return
		}

		// Add LDAP attributes that were looked up into the claims.
		for attribKey, attribValue := range lookupResult.Attributes {
			opts.claims[ldapAttribPrefix+attribKey] = attribValue
		}
	}

 * that is how the signature looked even prior to this comment! So naturally any change can break
 * existing users, but it can't *fix* existing users because any users who needed
 * `Function<@Nullable A, @Nullable B>` already had to find a workaround. Still, there is a *ton* of
 * fallout from trying to switch. I would be shocked if the switch would offer benefits to anywhere