* The index in the {@link #parts()} list at which the public suffix begins. For example, for the
   * domain name {@code myblog.blogspot.co.uk}, the value would be 1 (the index of the {@code
   * blogspot} part). The value is negative (specifically, {@link #NO_SUFFIX_FOUND}) if no public
   * suffix was found.
   */
  private int publicSuffixIndex() {
    int publicSuffixIndexLocal = publicSuffixIndexCache;

    initCollectionWithNullElement();
    try {
      assertSetCount(null, 1);
    } catch (UnsupportedOperationException tolerated) {
    }
  }

  // Negative count.

  @CollectionFeature.Require(SUPPORTS_REMOVE)
  public void testSetCount_negative_removeSupported() {
    assertThrows(IllegalArgumentException.class, () -> setCountNoCheckReturnValue(e3(), -1));
  }

    return new UnsignedLong(bits);
  }

  /**
   * Returns an {@code UnsignedLong} representing the same value as the specified {@code long}.
   *
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code value} is negative
   * @since 14.0
   */
  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public static UnsignedLong valueOf(long value) {
    checkArgument(value >= 0, "value (%s) is outside the range for an unsigned long value", value);

Pull requests
-------------

Unless the change is a trivial fix such as for a typo, it's generally best to
start by opening a new issue describing the bug or feature you're intending to
fix. Even if you think it's relatively minor, it's helpful to know what people
are working on. And as mentioned above, API changes should be discussed
thoroughly before moving to code.

Some examples of types of pull requests that are immediately helpful:

   * to the JDK until JDK 7.
   *
   * @param a the first {@code double} to compare
   * @param b the second {@code double} to compare
   * @return a negative value if {@code a} is less than {@code b}; a positive value if {@code a} is
   *     greater than {@code b}; or zero if they are equal
   */
  @InlineMe(replacement = "Double.compare(a, b)")

import com.google.common.testing.NullPointerTester;
import java.text.ParseException;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * {@link TestCase} for {@link HostSpecifier}. This is a relatively cursory test, as HostSpecifier
 * is a thin wrapper around {@link InetAddresses} and {@link InternetDomainName}; the unit tests for
 * those classes explore numerous corner cases. The intent here is to confirm that everything is

import com.google.common.cache.TestingCacheLoaders.IncrementingLoader;
import com.google.common.testing.FakeTicker;
import junit.framework.TestCase;
import org.jspecify.annotations.NullUnmarked;

/**
 * Tests relating to automatic cache refreshing.
 *
 * @author Charles Fry
 */
@NullUnmarked
public class CacheRefreshTest extends TestCase {
  public void testAutoRefresh() {
    FakeTicker ticker = new FakeTicker();

  @CanIgnoreReturnValue
  public FakeTicker setAutoIncrementStep(long autoIncrementStep, TimeUnit timeUnit) {
    checkArgument(autoIncrementStep >= 0, "May not auto-increment by a negative amount");
    this.autoIncrementStepNanos = timeUnit.toNanos(autoIncrementStep);
    return this;
  }

  /**
   * Sets the increment applied to the ticker whenever it is queried.
   *

   * @param expectedValuesPerKey the expected average number of values per key
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code expectedKeys} or {@code expectedValuesPerKey} is
   *     negative
   */
  public static <K extends @Nullable Object, V extends @Nullable Object>
      ArrayListMultimap<K, V> create(int expectedKeys, int expectedValuesPerKey) {

   * elements.
   *
   * @param distinctElements the expected number of distinct elements
   * @throws IllegalArgumentException if {@code distinctElements} is negative
   */
  public static <E extends @Nullable Object> HashMultiset<E> create(int distinctElements) {
    return new HashMultiset<>(distinctElements);
  }

  /**